IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] email granularity, was: WebSockets feedback

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 16 April 2010 07:43 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A36BA3A6AF5 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.968
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.968 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.369, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7priLnOSIgSM for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:43:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9FC3A3A6AD5 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:41:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2010 07:41:23 -0000
Received: from p508FEB60.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.33]) [80.143.235.96] by mail.gmx.net (mp013) with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 09:41:23 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1858sk4HnM5vj99PJU21me8jjVf7tW0KCPxBUrUdK woUagtNjiITBdn
Message-ID: <4BC81496.9000007@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:41:10 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060516 Thunderbird/1.5.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
References: <B578CFED7FE85644A170F4F7C9D52692019544C5@ESESSCMS0361.eemea.ericsson.se> <3d5f2a811003150230sdeb4f78hbdece96e5c742cfc@mail.gmail.com> <de17d48e1003180316w3dda1a3fo7db8b357925ec3f8@mail.gmail.com> <p2o3d5f2a811003310031x5dce7e9cs86a5a8981cd23c1d@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1004140032040.875@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <w2y5821ea241004142323h949c0b07l771171500a625a6c@mail.gmail.com> <4BC6DD89.4060502@gmx.de> <r2x5821ea241004150244ud3cb79bt757049890bf3d9ab@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1004151908320.23507@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <4BC76724.5090307@gmx.de> <4BC8105F.5000006@webtide.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BC8105F.5000006@webtide.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-FuHaFi: 0.68000000000000005
Cc: Hybi <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] email granularity, was: WebSockets feedback
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 07:43:13 -0000

On 16.04.2010 09:23, Greg Wilkins wrote:
> ...
> Actually, my real preference is that we get started
> using trac to focus on individual issues and nail
> them down 1 by 1 to get a good statement of requirements.
> Without that, I think we will never converge on
> consensus, regardless of how we thread our emails.
> ...

My experience is that abusing a issue tracker for *discussion* is a 
terrible thing. (Been there in several WGs, and it didn't work well)

If you use it as *replacement* for email discussion than I *think* we'll 
have to set Trac up so that every change generates an email notification 
to this list.

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email