Re: [I18ndir] Review volunteer needed (Fwd: [dispatch] WGLC of draft-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs-07)

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 30 April 2020 01:50 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C183A0CB2 for <i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 18:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1536-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=iecc.com header.b=oHdYX6vF; dkim=fail (1536-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=taugh.com header.b=dQYsFxM+
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P6yQ3_Yu9vOD for <i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 18:50:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5766E3A0CB1 for <i18ndir@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 18:50:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 70911 invoked by uid 100); 30 Apr 2020 01:50:41 -0000
Date: 30 Apr 2020 01:50:41 -0000
Message-ID: <r8dath$24k8$1@gal.iecc.com>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: i18ndir@ietf.org
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:cleverness; s=114f7.5eaa2ef1.k2004; i=news@user.iecc.com; bh=PranM0x2UrOtFSh5C3x+7/XWqr+XxRUNkmDMmUksqjA=; b=oHdYX6vF0bTk0GoJdAb8U79n3vTrUf77Wh5iiQv7cqSkd1WaTjnoh47DVkGUWkQEkB+DHJ7/fushX2cobSa38aeefB4FGOoR/nEz2J/vVpLjnHQKFMCHR26vlpcYEHTbna/m3KqYjMP2OEjd8lLFjGZtIfGuH87DK4O1+RHTewsWp/t1GFl3eWQcBG09jizlsmWRnuusmqka//+GGjk5nOQCkansZhlm6txr1B/Af2ZJbzOizyZsrOBUAKglst5F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:cleverness; s=114f7.5eaa2ef1.k2004; olt=news@user.iecc.com; bh=PranM0x2UrOtFSh5C3x+7/XWqr+XxRUNkmDMmUksqjA=; b=dQYsFxM+wfTbPiFoE7Jj3BEI9E2LVilVrT+sPbBnUYG193zRa/UjjLPc/BQ2K3SnSRnRj+SQOymIHhxh6aV/nsujEmPte52qY/GL7tv5cuiZCtS4O5kZWl9PIEdG1mUlRmhGDY1HqAHuAvoow0XRHicUMcaqO09DTgFfIBI+tjH2qluDAl4p1ktErN7sJUMug3HRQl9rgFwZ0k9QxLWDRkD8KLyDHm7SMN65AFQsIbD4SYLcz0CxpmWlMorY3KgP
Organization: Taughannock Networks
References: <E552C138-7938-42BD-B2B2-26AD8AA43516@nostrum.com> <A9854982-3696-46FF-AD5C-8088CFCDD8FC@frobbit.se> <E67F0F68A403F5E4E5D8F476@PSB> <0c3f5982-108d-81e0-29a4-ce67e7685f2e@ix.netcom.com>
In-Reply-To: <E552C138-7938-42BD-B2B2-26AD8AA43516@nostrum.com> <A9854982-3696-46FF-AD5C-8088CFCDD8FC@frobbit.se> <E67F0F68A403F5E4E5D8F476@PSB> <0c3f5982-108d-81e0-29a4-ce67e7685f2e@ix.netcom.com>
Cleverness: some
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: johnl@iecc.com (John Levine)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i18ndir/0f8Gouon4Zo9xqSikTYlpe94tls>
Subject: Re: [I18ndir] Review volunteer needed (Fwd: [dispatch] WGLC of draft-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs-07)
X-BeenThere: i18ndir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internationalization Directorate <i18ndir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i18ndir>, <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i18ndir/>
List-Post: <mailto:i18ndir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i18ndir>, <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 01:50:45 -0000

In article <0c3f5982-108d-81e0-29a4-ce67e7685f2e@ix.netcom.com>om>,
Asmus Freytag  <asmusf@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>+4 Aren't UTF-16 BOM versions are not legal UTF-8 byte sequences, or am 
>I misremebering?

You are correct.  That's the little table in sec 4.2.

> If so, a UTF-16 BOM should override or flag as invalid 
>any UTF-8 declaration.

That's what sec 4.2 sort of says.  But it doesn't really need to,
since somewhere else it says that text with invalid characters is invalid.

R's,
John
-- 
Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly