[I18ndir] I18ndir last call review of draft-faltstrom-unicode11-08
"Asmus, Inc. via Datatracker" <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 05 March 2021 03:57 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: i18ndir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 097753A1CFE; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 19:57:13 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Asmus, Inc. via Datatracker" <noreply@ietf.org>
To: i18ndir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-faltstrom-unicode11.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.27.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <161491663292.10706.8764718902953358427@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: "Asmus, Inc." <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 19:57:12 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i18ndir/Dc3MwULdmdx5J6FocTyj4de9CBA>
Subject: [I18ndir] I18ndir last call review of draft-faltstrom-unicode11-08
X-BeenThere: i18ndir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Internationalization Directorate <i18ndir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i18ndir>, <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i18ndir/>
List-Post: <mailto:i18ndir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i18ndir>, <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 03:57:13 -0000
Reviewer: Asmus, Inc. Review result: Ready with Nits (1) The math of code points needs to be reviewed in section 4.3. It appears to not account for a property change for U+111C9 (2) In Section 5, there's a sentence that seems to have a sense destroying edit: The code point if being accepted might due ???? to implementations of IDNA2008 based on older versions of Unicode than 11.0.0 be rejected. (3) plural noun/verb mismatch in section 6 ... new versions [...] is... (4) Section 8: use of definite article. Drop "the" in front of Unicode Version (also check other instances) (5) Usefully, the discussion of SHARADA SANDHI MARK could point out whether it treated the same or different from other SANDHI marks in related scripts. (From just looking at the tables, and not the original UCD entries, it looks like that they are all now treated the same, which would be beneficial under the "least astonishment" principle - or whatever it's called). This review based primarily on the diff, with just some look at the full text to get the complete context for some items.
- [I18ndir] I18ndir last call review of draft-falts… Asmus, Inc. via Datatracker
- Re: [I18ndir] I18ndir last call review of draft-f… John C Klensin
- Re: [I18ndir] I18ndir last call review of draft-f… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [I18ndir] [Last-Call] I18ndir last call revie… Salz, Rich
- Re: [I18ndir] [Last-Call] I18ndir last call revie… John Levine
- Re: [I18ndir] I18ndir last call review of draft-f… Pete Resnick
- Re: [I18ndir] I18ndir last call review of draft-f… Patrik Fältström