Re: [I18ndir] Review volunteer needed (Fwd: [dispatch] WGLC of draft-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs-07)

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 30 April 2020 01:48 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9C53A0C9D for <i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 18:48:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.85
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.85 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=IKr72lqy; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=CJXljzk7
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KjKj-vtuT5Wb for <i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 18:48:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33A323A0C9C for <i18ndir@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 18:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 70284 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2020 01:48:30 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=11287.5eaa2e6e.k2004; bh=1HprNiV/poez9M+fM/yWs2olnw7fm9GX8zXpyeN18+4=; b=IKr72lqyeSC35TXsIlU1EbSgJNgpzzCjycaZxhul5+7gBoB/8T/FgqUSuQw4waIY+82q2bEPAxRXEZq2QByjGhWiuFvO+dUd8guRB9+Noc2zZ+/JRwhhigFPCZqWd2ccxBrt4212L5lcp0DbNdoizFmYObwQFVTi+a7mQG/LtbQpG1XVlMqZ1RQ26fjmaTUYPZC0bBNmy8L/AfmCaz5dpYsJsTpDvkw5EhUVVuaw9g7sqzxEOBlpr/YWJZVG0Y8T
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=11287.5eaa2e6e.k2004; bh=1HprNiV/poez9M+fM/yWs2olnw7fm9GX8zXpyeN18+4=; b=CJXljzk7iCOtuLC7+36KF1xmhmlCLRkMJzlEpXFRLZ5cNRCJNQnzc6pJ1Zo2S5GYIzkP8SJAlemjvQSV7Y1KE5gfGwqLk3CuSvgJqcC628gH3hhQBPaPakxwjezXOenH/513GwmxPtJfnDffL5uGiOijLAgIlqD0R2ANRXYXOIwZr0srnS9CaN+gt/EEVmKSIA0eV4fxIMZ4dkh/DoZ30+KJSb7KVFOAsxGKsDtN7HtvdxmueI1uMiwtTUclEtmR
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTP via TCP6; 30 Apr 2020 01:48:29 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id C0BDE188B54A; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 21:48:29 -0400 (EDT)
Date: 29 Apr 2020 21:48:29 -0400
Message-Id: <20200430014829.C0BDE188B54A@ary.qy>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: i18ndir@ietf.org
Cc: patrik@frobbit.se
In-Reply-To: <A9854982-3696-46FF-AD5C-8088CFCDD8FC@frobbit.se>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i18ndir/MaleJ6A5P_JFc6x2pXovVEIm1ao>
Subject: Re: [I18ndir] Review volunteer needed (Fwd: [dispatch] WGLC of draft-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs-07)
X-BeenThere: i18ndir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internationalization Directorate <i18ndir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i18ndir>, <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i18ndir/>
List-Post: <mailto:i18ndir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i18ndir>, <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 01:48:35 -0000

In article <A9854982-3696-46FF-AD5C-8088CFCDD8FC@frobbit.se> you write:
>I went to the ECMA spec and see they use UTF-16 all over the place, and have to bend over backwards to get things
>right. It feels like reading a BER encoding spec (again). :-)

They painted themselves into a corner with UCS a long time ago, but their current spec says in
section 10:

 The actual encodings used to store and interchange ECMAScript source
  text is not relevant to this specification.

R's,
John