Re: [I18ndir] Will there be an I18N directorate meeting at IETF 108?

Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com> Tue, 23 June 2020 22:35 UTC

Return-Path: <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>
X-Original-To: i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FF163A0C05 for <i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:35:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.995
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.995 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ix.netcom.com; domainkeys=pass (2048-bit key) header.from=asmusf@ix.netcom.com header.d=ix.netcom.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z9VJPOkq_-LL for <i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:35:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4EA43A0C04 for <i18ndir@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:35:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ix.netcom.com; s=dk12062016; t=1592951757; bh=f/nh/m/PJcCTs+yJ2qmZ+aOvd6T5aBotNN7l mOo1UL0=; h=Received:Subject:To:References:From:Message-ID:Date: User-Agent:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Language: X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; b=EmljidaRD5h2KANgG4RrP3sZwztqgdaEU Al5aB+NIx7NJl4/kqVE+BLAcR8JixFUOrrThgm6apbVSGyO2vbeTSZO7bO+nvHG9QL7 4A+k2uDdzI9VqGMyq4zj8kngOIirORZnVJKqt/RoHfTr7agNjl3BLmxM/g5HYiqQcWl 59E0YFIxWUx/5fOehbiGKu60WeG+cYG7Zuyf9YBdoqumlSg+Q6wamboHg40fY4yxTbw HrC4GZEcqgbucBG9eAVOFvkz87GQ+EfqaqANu4lMhRrUX17SbmUaYwo0P+gObH324bE SfNxDYVh8ypmFXfIPygqhq0sttXEa9n6vJ8Sa2Qwg==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk12062016; d=ix.netcom.com; b=nqkS5wQKObePB5BH5jJNxyF05jDuWxrQmz4c1ogzu6VdfVO9SleL8jT2k8BIk5LO+Zw6k2Dwz+5wLDkxFO95cQubgAQsN8vzt2zAJm6xqC2jL+uEiFUyBPWl7WqNooCdrlw+Dnit96WrpZONhtG9ognVkyyJ2pgwM48blgeYG409dtbHwpIJw0BMXQzrX134vQhWQk0Kgy3rTYn7RxQLE398YHVYUpqoaGgf1Lz8EwRflzZ+y5QrXBixF8naKS7Y1sNEd7+ETgCjd1BqTx6QlgR28+oAw6XrqYDFRu6FNTwDJXWKFul6SJ34Fbo/Lk8E9Y2ZPZYxyEkTWIFku6KP0A==; h=Received:Subject:To:References:From:Message-ID:Date:User-Agent:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Language:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [71.212.59.17] (helo=[192.168.1.106]) by elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4) (envelope-from <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>) id 1jnrWG-0001XN-6L for i18ndir@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 18:35:56 -0400
To: i18ndir@ietf.org
References: <20200623160021.GO3100@localhost> <723F92393735E684C75471FA@PSB> <20200623191501.GP3100@localhost> <20200623192230.GQ3100@localhost> <56481213-ac60-29e2-7393-ad2a10025911@ix.netcom.com> <20200623223133.GR3100@localhost>
From: Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <537cbb56-6006-7df6-b95a-6d7d9f0bdb43@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:35:55 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200623223133.GR3100@localhost>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------1F58BF960AAFD68E63739BB3"
Content-Language: en-US
X-ELNK-Trace: 464f085de979d7246f36dc87813833b22356fd30c7fd936eef32dfcd7ba7cf0544adec4a5f646119350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 71.212.59.17
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i18ndir/N7OsPSO3-tlrOHKp9_59JcfvMXE>
Subject: Re: [I18ndir] Will there be an I18N directorate meeting at IETF 108?
X-BeenThere: i18ndir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internationalization Directorate <i18ndir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i18ndir>, <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i18ndir/>
List-Post: <mailto:i18ndir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i18ndir>, <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 22:35:59 -0000

On 6/23/2020 3:31 PM, Nico Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 03:17:37PM -0700, Asmus Freytag wrote:
>> On 6/23/2020 12:22 PM, Nico Williams wrote:
>>> I should add that I would like to discuss the filesystem I18N matter,
>>> and others might like to discuss updates to IDNA or whatever.  There's
>>> plenty of fodder for an actual meeting of this group.
>> Are you talking about a remote meeting or an in-person meeting?
> "Yes".  That is, IETF 108 is not in-person, but if it were, then I'd be
> asking about an in-person meeting, and since it's not, I'm asking about
> a remote meeting.
>
> In the context of an IETF meeting that is all-remote, the question of
> whether a WG or directorate would meet at that IETF really means whether
> we'd have a remote meeting scheduled in the sort of time slots you'd
> expect for that IETF meeting.  Since there is no published agenda yet,
> I don't know what time slots would be involved, but I assume lunch-time
> in CEST or something like that, on some day of the week.
>
> Nico

I'm fine, in principle, w/ attending a remote meeting during a time slot
that's within reason for the Pacific Time zone. (I'm unlikely to ever attend
an IETF meeting in person unless it coincides in location with some other
travel.)

A./