Re: [I18ndir] I18ndir last call review of draft-faltstrom-unicode11-08

[Pete Resnick <[e-mail]>]

Damn. That's mostly my fault. I clicked the wrong one in the datatracker tool.

:-(

pr

On 4 Mar 2021, at 23:04, John C Klensin wrote:

> (Last call list removed - as far as I know, there is no current
> IETF Last Call, especially on draft-draft-faltstrom-unicode11.)
>
> Without comment on any of the details right now (after the time
> that went into draft-crocker-inreply-react and a few other
> things, I'm going to need at least until the weekend), I just
> want to verify that you are looking at the current version of
> the current draft, which is draft-faltstrom-unicode12-01.  As
> far as I know, that version has not yet been made generally
> available but perhaps Patrik could make it available to the
> directorate list.
>
>    thanks,
>     john
>
>
> --On Thursday, March 4, 2021 19:57 -0800 "Asmus, Inc. via
> Datatracker" <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> Reviewer: Asmus, Inc.
>> Review result: Ready with Nits
>>
>> (1) The math of code points needs to be reviewed in section
>> 4.3. It appears to not account for a property change for
>> U+111C9
>>
>> (2) In Section 5, there's a sentence that seems to have a
>> sense destroying edit:
>>
>>      The code point if being accepted might due ???? to
>> implementations of      IDNA2008 based on older versions of
>> Unicode than 11.0.0 be rejected.
>>
>> (3) plural noun/verb mismatch in section 6
>>
>>     ... new versions [...] is...
>>
>> (4) Section 8: use of definite article. Drop "the" in front of
>> Unicode Version (also check other instances)
>>
>> (5) Usefully, the discussion of SHARADA SANDHI MARK could
>> point out whether it treated the same or different from other
>> SANDHI marks in related scripts. (From just looking at the
>> tables, and not the original UCD entries, it looks like that
>> they are all now treated the same, which would be beneficial
>> under the "least astonishment" principle - or whatever it's
>> called).
>>
>> This review based primarily on the diff, with just some look
>> at the full text to get the complete context for some items.


-- 
Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best