Re: [I18ndir] EAI: RFC 6531 Updates 5321?
John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 28 October 2020 16:12 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B7A03A07C4 for <i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 09:12:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.85
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.85 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=GDor44Y+; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=dZZ+50LB
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EzHgU27cs3p9 for <i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 09:12:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C22F3A07AE for <i18ndir@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 09:12:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 92813 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2020 16:12:28 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=16a8b.5f99986c.k2010; bh=XDzLrIjviIUFWt/KqRDmuZG0VguOaEfNo6ydjZ8BA4U=; b=GDor44Y+Ecq83JhLLb4gY+4lAXJbAf1r4WRn/QnYNh+cXzNVo14qBhA00q9JUk4T5NUfj08tucTjDN0ym/irudpWY1mhI1s7S6EjfYNUXiViPcPyGKoz1NHOci8YOiwatJbXOMp2KvKmNfr/QksoU1liMhBmI2ig0wdXRAvtxLiYsCWZ4TdRqn8ztaOwkhE2Bn9jHVtqcTOKq/f4Id6kFFFd1JvjVyHxdT/Kz9UEYfjgUKmGbvo4FNLHhjbuEAEizZOR99RKK2ibECWETIz31dlrxJp1OOOjDDGOZhg7j9oq1KGriXokSx2Lsxevss7qpjPbGWM7HbcyU6koVLkdyg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=16a8b.5f99986c.k2010; bh=XDzLrIjviIUFWt/KqRDmuZG0VguOaEfNo6ydjZ8BA4U=; b=dZZ+50LBsGxEtf+pjdIiaattiQdfM6tZq+y9BSnagUYjqUBtrR7OapVRXVmcCcXosXsqC+Ku16XXD+nUuScePr+/1omZhq88GzaycvPL0+AUKHlfhh4MiZmxFHBa1eT1nwv9zQwBYTVcGb8dfOAzVnEzb32JDuLU3/KAL4L0FRAhz6bluijWXpcdqS7PXZWHhm3BW6IAt/d0hk3tUpr6ruzGgrPo0zn+8Lu/dC8epX3uyLXaQ9upDbdaQzLvIDRR3nKwwKjMd8YbazafYKBsFfWei+gskgN0YZ+ZK39wfK1WR7W2RoWmrZgusmLF8sj+w0QjxYSMTszvvmGZRDCvfg==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 28 Oct 2020 16:12:28 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id C72832508CEB; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 12:12:27 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 12:12:27 -0400
Message-Id: <20201028161227.C72832508CEB@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: i18ndir@ietf.org
Cc: shollenbeck@verisign.com
In-Reply-To: <6353e26525fa4249960a1bc1468c796d@verisign.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i18ndir/WVafLqll0P47_VxpGEXiB-jstZk>
Subject: Re: [I18ndir] EAI: RFC 6531 Updates 5321?
X-BeenThere: i18ndir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internationalization Directorate <i18ndir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i18ndir>, <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i18ndir/>
List-Post: <mailto:i18ndir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i18ndir>, <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 16:12:32 -0000
In article <6353e26525fa4249960a1bc1468c796d@verisign.com> you write: >characters", but there's nothing I can find in the Datatracker to note that 6531 updates 5321. 6531 *is* described as >obsoleting 5336. Am I missing something? Shouldn't the Datatracker note the update relationships explicitly? SMTP extensions don't update 5321 because they're optional. The only RFC that has updated 5321 is 7504 which defines two new reply codes that mail clients have to deal with. In github-ese we might say that 6531 forks 5321 and 6532 forks 5322 but there's no good way to say that in an RFC. R's, John
- [I18ndir] EAI: RFC 6531 Updates 5321? Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: [I18ndir] EAI: RFC 6531 Updates 5321? John Levine
- Re: [I18ndir] EAI: RFC 6531 Updates 5321? Jiankang Yao
- Re: [I18ndir] EAI: RFC 6531 Updates 5321? Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: [I18ndir] EAI: RFC 6531 Updates 5321? John C Klensin
- Re: [I18ndir] EAI: RFC 6531 Updates 5321? John Levine