Re: [I18ndir] Will there be an I18N directorate meeting at IETF 108?

Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com> Wed, 24 June 2020 21:27 UTC

Return-Path: <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>
X-Original-To: i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AB853A11C2 for <i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 14:27:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.996
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ix.netcom.com; domainkeys=pass (2048-bit key) header.from=asmusf@ix.netcom.com header.d=ix.netcom.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xfOtGGlKb1Wm for <i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 14:27:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83E4E3A11AC for <i18ndir@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 14:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ix.netcom.com; s=dk12062016; t=1593034053; bh=OqAeQLXxmz7m2JkJaI3PcdQiNIDa7CNsdII+ mnvbvy8=; h=Received:Subject:To:References:From:Message-ID:Date: User-Agent:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Language: X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; b=O1qqmTbOZIZToUZFDxTLpvYdeeYRqFqPH XQhxC18ov7KpZY9OP0EzQfBNFSEs86qvpOI1ktylA62QYZusZoXq+F1cgaJApsIdD3r DeaxUm6NWtoubVL/0j74aATPAJOSXgWztHjJUD3xAuOuvDM6hndmVFlG9zbZjV2PP4k pKbWl9gYvsH3okYLz55q4gd40djIpYWupWksV9GmOdTPqs8XQicheGnJJNtEKBIb7Xy 4k013N1bVtTov0p/Xz/YyzE31lYfMJtVNBKUr1Jz0AHXH+X03WwjAuLZuiRc+Wun3x4 UYxUjSTH8LFQ/YVnjrZUPXKIs9qKjSzNAqMk7/4Bw==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk12062016; d=ix.netcom.com; b=qnq6SGV9G4XVc7BwFrMHo6YVW9E+ayJAPebWp4620Vlyec1dRslI1NNGVVey4CVPPFrdy/Lxhk+UqV/w+SYEsRpcSzaeNp3x4YrHTq6OC/Fobd1D472r2OypjmE5qqHdVL78dsDRD2RRERK4zyWuHFB0AdueafxNXAbXolmmzCEzNQQ4gC95rIHjV2PsRxgcnge6Fn4g4YgpZVx43ELXRWNJYt96T7KfCx6tv6VCq+VovvkNLaBtayAXtNDLHpCK6fwT0DuVLpbLm77wHWGay3yxoXu6WundDfsDuuRZ5rAebIYfKhGDM0YHuu4jD8AP2JHRjNn4nXpz4QVVceNk9w==; h=Received:Subject:To:References:From:Message-ID:Date:User-Agent:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Language:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [71.212.59.17] (helo=[192.168.1.106]) by elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4) (envelope-from <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>) id 1joCvc-00011y-CP for i18ndir@ietf.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 17:27:32 -0400
To: i18ndir@ietf.org
References: <20200623160021.GO3100@localhost> <723F92393735E684C75471FA@PSB> <20200623191501.GP3100@localhost> <C2D29B21FB339FE6B5820D39@PSB> <20200624052654.GS3100@localhost> <B439664D0432EDABFEB98988@PSB> <20200624151328.GT3100@localhost>
From: Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <741410f2-94b7-e742-0f91-79eebe27738c@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 14:27:32 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200624151328.GT3100@localhost>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------B19E1C95E2203F6FE6290C31"
Content-Language: en-US
X-ELNK-Trace: 464f085de979d7246f36dc87813833b22356fd30c7fd936ec7046acac96075b2caa6d64bd805abb1350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 71.212.59.17
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i18ndir/e29mjpDFcJU_QwxaBt5139cJsg0>
Subject: Re: [I18ndir] Will there be an I18N directorate meeting at IETF 108?
X-BeenThere: i18ndir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internationalization Directorate <i18ndir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i18ndir>, <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i18ndir/>
List-Post: <mailto:i18ndir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i18ndir>, <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 21:27:43 -0000

All,

I'm not going to deep-end on this, but I tend to support Nico's
position in this.

A./

PS: it would not be the first time that i18n gets handled
slightly differently from other topics. There's something
about it.

On 6/24/2020 8:13 AM, Nico Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 02:13:13AM -0400, John C Klensin wrote:
>> --On Wednesday, June 24, 2020 00:26 -0500 Nico Williams
>> <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:
>>> Surely that is sufficient evidence that this group is a
>>> directorate.
>> Except that "directorate" in the sense above is not (absent one
>> hypothesis) what is actually happening; [...]
> This group is too -officially!- a directorate.  If you think it doesn't
> act as one, therefore it is not or should not be one, fine, ask that it
> be officially downgraded to a review team, or that it be disbanded.  But
> for the moment it is officially a directorate even if you don't like it
> being so.
>
> I await a response from the chairs.  If the chairs would like to test
> consensus for having or not having meetings, that's great, and since we
> know where you and I stand on that, maybe we can let other participants
> weigh in.
>
> Nico
>
> PS: Oh, and in regards to IDNA updates, perhaps a meeting would help you
>      sell your proposal.  I don't understand your urge to give up on IDNA
>      updates without a fight when you -apparently- feel so strongly about
>      it.  Sell us on it, and we might furnish the additional interest/
>      energy that you need that you think is absent.
>