IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [I18ndir] [Last-Call] [art] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-12

Patrik Fältström <paf@paftech.se> Thu, 18 August 2022 12:34 UTC

Return-Path: <paf@paftech.se>
X-Original-To: i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E204EC14F72A; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 05:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=paftech.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EtxqaUoNvrBy; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 05:33:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.paftech.se (vm01.paftech.se [192.165.72.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE059C14CE45; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 05:33:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.13.36.13] (office28.ggv13.sth.netnod.se [77.72.226.28]) by mail.paftech.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B1734040D; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 14:33:55 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paftech.se; s=2022013001; t=1660826035; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=MSfjzD0eTM+IZhoE91j2EQEomqIQN5+BAJlBaKsXI/Q=; b=kwa2SIVtLvjNNiamZlAyA5ZmQoHwHiM7wZTyn1hEfi5xVHqXaV9C5ZUFm8lHARkOXzyZw3 Zn5AL3hua7SknhXGlaJu6J1aFvXbrSWG7QPTafYipPQBq2+6JdHmzXYotpUHXNO+jC2Xkq UG9R8UEfF3MVkMNK+disZJ/oebnIPyo=
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@paftech.se>
To: "Gould, James" <jgould=40verisign.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: beldmit@gmail.com, john-ietf@jck.com, art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, regext@ietf.org, i18ndir@ietf.org, gen-art@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 14:33:53 +0200
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5910)
Message-ID: <6B2E9B10-BCA0-4B17-9E1B-D60755BCA853@paftech.se>
In-Reply-To: <BBBD2D00-31E1-41A2-A1FA-C336D333B0EA@verisign.com>
References: <BBBD2D00-31E1-41A2-A1FA-C336D333B0EA@verisign.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_004D7416-20A4-42FF-A53E-951BCEF43391_="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i18ndir/nGKyUdwBzjrCt26ksWjEXZPfJaM>
Subject: Re: [I18ndir] [Last-Call] [art] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-12
X-BeenThere: i18ndir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internationalization Directorate <i18ndir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i18ndir>, <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i18ndir/>
List-Post: <mailto:i18ndir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i18ndir>, <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 12:34:01 -0000

On 18 Aug 2022, at 14:31, Gould, James wrote:

> By creating a standard around draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai it should decrease diversity of proprietary extensions with adding EAI support to EPP.

Indeed it will, as long as the specification on how to do it is stringent enough. I just wanted to reemphasise what John Klensin wrote -- a warning that there should not be "too many degrees of freedom" in the specification created.

   Patrik

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email