Re: [I18ndir] Guidance on Return of A-Labels in a URL?

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 10 September 2020 21:05 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03BEE3A00C9 for <i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:05:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=qcZnkqk6; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=rpM0gP5H
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ugcX1QoOXmPs for <i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:05:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13CAC3A0045 for <i18ndir@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 30376 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2020 21:05:50 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=76a6.5f5a952e.k2009; bh=RBSagJxl/D/9TS2iyG7LG/iUxkjnuV0qQqy0akJq6kg=; b=qcZnkqk60JSCNjzGlAh+LAx2FNKCYeHOWUY3dWW3v+lwl+LSk2S6qDW79R/wXqTJ3YxNZ+eew2cusB6QsDnbI+7BIw6lVW5QxyExKBvCYk7CLb1xQeSAKN5CMaK/sbmiyed+r8ryBktXVclgV12QS5jwUUusqNxWu2exJBsfGOTO3RoylisaQhXu+w5udr7thVY8NckWKgsxfpz7iNiXDyWaWE7egZURown/CChxClZiW8iNBO3tkaKjCQP6mJGy+tSbxfiZhheqR/n5LXKLWGEwJDMbd/2BNRzwBr/WRroRhDZZkbsVTzq4HDMH5VPyWfENT9H1d0XnTJEq9RRdEw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=76a6.5f5a952e.k2009; bh=RBSagJxl/D/9TS2iyG7LG/iUxkjnuV0qQqy0akJq6kg=; b=rpM0gP5HIpGwWFmJY+EFmHrFCcdcHus83I/D3yymQ9x/UpKE8dDqP8aCPlXPBnKbRWZYEDu2hw7t9YWCBDC1lOjIWOIkP/72DBIgfvfLkz51uxm9/q6EkOdQEPts4Q9fRcip4ZTl+4rV+qH8vrTEYWiJE6/zWg2m/oEjqodb/9UvSB8CCyGa87+yXKlfx/ccyWhZU5e7n4ikzLSs/yhrrMkJZsqnAZBsfvsoCNaT/MwY3hSgDOd+8hvOdGdyeQcGdDur8vfJ0EJuUtJ1mOppNRezTMKtHGwfxFZhuUmKlvOS5ho9CXX7GOgkLEW7q6+2OP9/y4quZcpjjMQDyLHfzg==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 10 Sep 2020 21:05:50 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 27F55204E962; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 17:05:50 -0400 (EDT)
Date: 10 Sep 2020 17:05:50 -0400
Message-Id: <20200910210550.27F55204E962@ary.qy>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: i18ndir@ietf.org
Cc: patrik@frobbit.se
In-Reply-To: <0864F4FF-A615-451E-8828-433F3098A599@frobbit.se>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i18ndir/rRv9NkWXg685VKxoAt7wvlFkP0I>
Subject: Re: [I18ndir] Guidance on Return of A-Labels in a URL?
X-BeenThere: i18ndir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internationalization Directorate <i18ndir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i18ndir>, <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i18ndir/>
List-Post: <mailto:i18ndir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i18ndir>, <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:05:54 -0000

In article <0864F4FF-A615-451E-8828-433F3098A599@frobbit.se> you write:
>I can see situations where you in RDAP do want to be able to send random Unicode Code Points just with the intention
>to do some search on the server, but that is then NOT a U-Label. The same way I do see interest in sending A-Labels
>to be sure the string is stable and as it was supposed to be during the whole transaction.

It also makes sense because RDAP is a host-host protocol and not
host-user. If the client wants to turn A-labels into U-labels for
display, that's easy enough.

-- 
Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly