IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [I18ndir] [Last-Call] last call reviews of draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-12 (and -15)

Dmitry Belyavsky <beldmit@gmail.com> Tue, 23 August 2022 06:43 UTC

Return-Path: <beldmit@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2D32C14CF1E; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 23:43:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4khWeAPZZaG1; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 23:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw1-x112b.google.com (mail-yw1-x112b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::112b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26654C1527A4; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 23:43:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw1-x112b.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-335624d1e26so354934557b3.4; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 23:43:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=bK+GNKlhy9PbWwtZRUZiegHq//ysTDzHZe9GZzfDloA=; b=ByrJk2sRh0Tp4dMuhsYE3VNC+mbxSB1YjP7YBLLTjhwPbBhSs2HHTKo1oIXTjVOVUZ Igqggz6XZklv0tqnYrOR9V+k9g9dvfTraZS0wAgnnH30ztjXxQysFOt3ecanlBeVgylt jNhmtJFMyfs6Zm2vC7HkvDE0bCf5q8HEyo8HHo0Ja2urcttqurkVVwtptNt5eo7zKHVA AuHgtVwlwyA4cwsMdL/gNoql+x3TUMveEmCfWk1jrygqSyv+Smn/oioDLmNa8OcUdL9V v8hGP6Voy+heiNlmecFAzU83yFWzbhykqaBrLNYgkLH+91Xi9kTp/5fAlxuJj0jcDrZm G29w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=bK+GNKlhy9PbWwtZRUZiegHq//ysTDzHZe9GZzfDloA=; b=F57ydCHemq9K36q/o5XecdL5STIGTL1OxZweLlr5t+fCK0kkDhqp6/bHzMlVX5RHjr 0B9xa/FeJrKWHdHghI/YUbnhGoNXJysxyKSCvhBv1gDRIj7sVMio0xAyrq1A3PHqCz6j 2fiuQ57oJuwIapx+JGU9HVeke67H5mL4ulEiOKua9YUb08ecnEcCs7yXrUzjkcqfj051 9cQ1CyhAfpxM9iUCach2hnofXsB9hRgImJxZzHR7/SM5xv+lUb9raiee3pDbqISCavDj wYnAXB5dN4n/NWZQTtW4HGZ2ST4yLMlObeAoTzl8cjZf3mFKd39uM8Bo1xHBubYEqYc3 O95w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo3oc78pnYlierfjY+xenMbe6hDs4A6C/BkHBo1uPE1/vYhwOvjq x/338qIN+f4fHrZLmJtJE2EJKdETzjzvBalh61c=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6bz+NsZvgSASLA/ITOb0st/nRMGJcBEGlzvC3+WTizJGZld3SsLPMKXacVxY6tp6uGjr/E+kUw+tRQnvDDMDw=
X-Received: by 2002:a81:ad1:0:b0:318:3b63:6d00 with SMTP id 200-20020a810ad1000000b003183b636d00mr24527289ywk.146.1661237017065; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 23:43:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4FFD4044-CB4C-46EC-AAAE-B84E6B3AB4B0@verisign.com> <C64CA7923ACF9C96102DCE57@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <C64CA7923ACF9C96102DCE57@PSB>
From: Dmitry Belyavsky <beldmit@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 08:43:25 +0200
Message-ID: <CADqLbzL2=03p8Ed5zBbp6nKAAye20dXBMpt+=be3xPdPxkJ+LA@mail.gmail.com>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Cc: "Gould, James" <jgould@verisign.com>, Patrik Fältström <paf@paftech.se>, "Gould, James" <jgould=40verisign.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, regext <regext@ietf.org>, i18ndir@ietf.org, gen-art@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004a3ca005e6e2e236"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i18ndir/uszHlPO4y_NEDOtmX6oMKPWkMt0>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 07:55:03 -0700
Subject: Re: [I18ndir] [Last-Call] last call reviews of draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-12 (and -15)
X-BeenThere: i18ndir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internationalization Directorate <i18ndir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i18ndir>, <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i18ndir/>
List-Post: <mailto:i18ndir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i18ndir>, <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 06:43:47 -0000

Dear John

On Tue, 23 Aug 2022, 04:27 John C Klensin, <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:

>
>
> --On Monday, August 22, 2022 16:01 +0000 "Gould, James"
> <jgould@verisign.com> wrote:
>
> > John,
> >
> > How about if we change the approach to use the well-understood
> > command-response extension?
>
> If things were changed to create an extension type that is
> defined in RFC 5730 rather than creating a new type, that would
> certainly eliminate the need to update 5730 (or explain clearly
> why that was not necessary).
>
> That, of course, leaves the more substantive SMTPUTF8 issues,
> particularly the need for a slot for an alternate all-ASCII
> address.
>

No. SMTPUTF8 email address _is_ email address. Otherwise we are stuck with
email addresses of first-class and of second-class forever.

We don't need separate slot for all-ASCII addresses.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email