IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [I18nrp] Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-unicode11-05.txt> (IDNA2008 and Unicode 11.0.0) to Informational RFC

"Patrik Fältström " <paf@frobbit.se> Tue, 04 December 2018 10:42 UTC

Return-Path: <paf@frobbit.se>
X-Original-To: i18nrp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i18nrp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85BD9130EA9 for <i18nrp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 02:42:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.722
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.722 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=frobbit.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EMkrGbmW3ohY for <i18nrp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 02:42:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.frobbit.se (mail.frobbit.se [85.30.129.185]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1787F12785F for <i18nrp@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 02:42:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [169.254.86.6] (unknown [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:0:29da:870d:c8f1:83f4]) by mail.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4989B203A8; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 11:42:00 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=frobbit.se; s=mail; t=1543920120; bh=BlXT1fSSdVvkB7zMcEae2vifQFRptarmubPFXcbZRN0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=a2XcEavnJZRQIFGzlpvFbV5eaPdeAnU3O9538h2j5NPyvZKeXLdz8BbM7HsrCwSsT LwgrGv2iS+7ICy7FCoL1SHPZp4gltSgqW22iPUTy9nQgOo/66oO9YL/d2lQmD6aqMI sTSQHQ7cqJXxHXEK507n2pi6e1gw06CSfI6l1MJU=
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Cc: Patrik Fältström <paf=40frobbit.se@dmarc.ietf.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, i18nrp@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 11:42:00 +0100
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.12.2r5568)
Message-ID: <47E009B8-6356-442B-9C97-B62782D75AA1@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <52B0425602FA315AB615B1A4@PSB>
References: <154385119878.18333.5085298134102919486.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <FF6F9EB9-C73B-4EC0-AC4F-3E3BFBABA0AB@vpnc.org> <8E20D432-01B0-4B52-80BB-3348C5FE73AF@vpnc.org> <CC73FC25-92FC-4822-B267-15C41CE450F2@frobbit.se> <52B0425602FA315AB615B1A4@PSB>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_AE0696E5-1A51-4C3E-AAFC-D570E7215682_="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i18nrp/8qI2NNj4RSNBYbZ5clBuyltj_mA>
Subject: Re: [I18nrp] Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-unicode11-05.txt> (IDNA2008 and Unicode 11.0.0) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: i18nrp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internationalization Review Procedures <i18nrp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i18nrp>, <mailto:i18nrp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i18nrp/>
List-Post: <mailto:i18nrp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i18nrp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i18nrp>, <mailto:i18nrp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 10:42:06 -0000

On 4 Dec 2018, at 11:40, John C Klensin wrote:

> For the record (because you, Patrik, know this already), "the klensin document" (an ambiguous reference because there are a few that may be relevant --see my response to Paul) was allowed to expire because there appeared to be no way to process it. In at least one case, I believe I was advised by a relevant AD to let it expire.  The request for the IETF 102 BOF was the result of that situation.  Those documents will be updated and reposted as soon as the Directorate (or the ART ADs) tell me to do so.

Correct, I knew this.

I just wanted to explain why the reference was removed from my draft.

   paf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email