IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [I18nrp] Conservatism principle doesn't go far enough

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Sun, 03 February 2019 04:49 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: i18nrp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i18nrp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE59130F0F for <i18nrp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Feb 2019 20:49:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.679
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.679 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2ieIQ_9IO0Un for <i18nrp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Feb 2019 20:49:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B3F81292F1 for <i18nrp@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Feb 2019 20:49:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MacBook-Pro.roach.at (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x134nVVS098838 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 2 Feb 2019 22:49:32 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1549169373; bh=4pHi3zTVe05b1dg2+WO3hYjjCz6K59aPkSyyc0r+H0M=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=GdIGZQRK8iuZOKs9dA8DiqLfU5uAPmUpUKIcldgveZD+LVl5J+jsGkbEQo3RuOC2F 1TF0DKrs52gpfqUFffz5Mknzz5YoOc0CHKS4hnFeYzbeE7v/5p8Zf6z21iMtIIDjKw nKzXPkvllt5jUHuAufxj8qco9ikAqrTu/rS0XcHU=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be MacBook-Pro.roach.at
To: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>, 'John C Klensin' <john-ietf@jck.com>, 'John Levine' <johnl@taugh.com>, i18nrp@ietf.org
Cc: 'Anne van Kesteren' <annevk@annevk.nl>
References: <20190201021802.A5160200D93BBA@ary.qy> <4C0F3C8D65FB57C697E72F8D@PSB> <016001d4bb75$15350130$3f9f0390$@acm.org>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <04aa6bca-0552-ca4e-b74b-8d542bea8a4d@nostrum.com>
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2019 22:49:25 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <016001d4bb75$15350130$3f9f0390$@acm.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i18nrp/F-gYIQ6pP5myalqdyG017Y0dp54>
Subject: Re: [I18nrp] Conservatism principle doesn't go far enough
X-BeenThere: i18nrp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internationalization Review Procedures <i18nrp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i18nrp>, <mailto:i18nrp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i18nrp/>
List-Post: <mailto:i18nrp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i18nrp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i18nrp>, <mailto:i18nrp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2019 04:49:50 -0000

On 2/2/19 10:01 PM, Larry Masinter wrote:
> I'd submit an issue but I can't figure out where.


If you want to pursue this with the Chromium team through a bug tracker, 
the entry point is here: https://chromiumbugs.appspot.com/

There may be more productive ways of engaging, though. I suspect that 
Mathias Bynens <mathias@qiwi.be> could have a useful discussion about 
this -- try sending him an email.

/a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email