[I18nrp] Was there ever a formal I18N directorate?

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 07 June 2018 17:49 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: i18nrp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i18nrp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0468130F7C for <i18nrp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 10:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kv2Z7IuJxYOv for <i18nrp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 10:49:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x231.google.com (mail-yw0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74458130F75 for <i18nrp@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 10:49:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x231.google.com with SMTP id j190-v6so3279066ywe.4 for <i18nrp@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 10:49:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=d85kX1CsOCIkLpaMZz3pPeCO5cdB5kYTFFmMLd+2N/c=; b=VRf4qMfifr1bRYGC+mqgdv2tOKlo5Po8Yc3t9XiPXECNr7N/++mJexNrSRrXoCt1JB 1gX8SONApBlg9YzwtVefcuOs0E1rKY/9WLf8zB3JB8pPrAD6LJQ20rxnUCkESfjkvKtJ pV3IF/TKAgcyTZWuiapYfe/ywRK/4HX9ZlcUUSq1NvR4sBWtVASfr83VnkyKQX6/jjf5 BfxOaGK8uTNU8+ypGboe2D5/+8NrUym6GO3D2pk+CDM0n3a1xjCqnTPb5nWQb9WaokLt fHONcTfRqx25De2IPtyAW1Qr7RQYw2+V4s7Ki61FvWNjiz6sUB8uS3Gh4s0uMzixDvOv X6Pg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=d85kX1CsOCIkLpaMZz3pPeCO5cdB5kYTFFmMLd+2N/c=; b=rbVaioCEtG2VNay0z+ILCRcr7UTuzuQ1HwqHb+wY0XrCOYHi8/b/nF9UOWuMobT+Ba 0UgDdMC5HC5ySd3ikqr2ySFkjf6BdKNYAiGBJI0wojAlruM48ZFvQM4vUc4d1t03nNUS qP75IHD0h42qFnoGd3sn27nldWXaOWRbsgwXAiSw7UZjCubu5MefeT8hkR3ynDOrj7nL jhnbEGVbn3EJ5btElJbKwE4PYF/lUaJDwqUYVzOniHQw+BvU1Rzj36WQRTcz20Qh95Zc Cy8SeZN+TQqDVeZkZmLXrnLTbsAFBnkBqPPV2s0eB/IHKxWOotwEaQFirTUyOZCeu4ls OgBQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E2/qkaeGHWEGXnJp3Vh1i0nlX5Sg6ntlwCjIfuJCWhNgoh/uwgL RZk13tynrO5uy0QjQtcCTaTsD9gFi/SkdcAQULI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKIM7o0IlskIWObk2z9XY7yIMhItFsIMt8BxediCRqGFHXKQWJWq/Nh1Eo8JH98YED33ONHBSKRk1D/gm6u6TDw=
X-Received: by 2002:a0d:c745:: with SMTP id j66-v6mr1659982ywd.27.1528393773092; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 10:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 12:49:21 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-cx+MOWL4Xiunph7ZS2q+OsJWzR25h3dtSgpSqBWSWXGQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: i18nrp@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ec16f4056e10e731"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i18nrp/G3zhqfkuzDjjKwq3hzNBP1Z9h0E>
Subject: [I18nrp] Was there ever a formal I18N directorate?
X-BeenThere: i18nrp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internationalization Review Procedures <i18nrp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i18nrp>, <mailto:i18nrp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i18nrp/>
List-Post: <mailto:i18nrp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i18nrp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i18nrp>, <mailto:i18nrp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 17:49:39 -0000

Dear I18Ners,

We're running off the edge of history for most of the IESG, but you folks
would know the answer to this.

There have been a few references to an Internationalization Directorate, as
if one existed in the past.

I know about the IAB's (now-concluded) Internationalization Program, mostly
because I was on the IAB when we created it, but I don't remember an actual
IETF Internationalization Directorate.

That's not surprising - I've done a lot of work on binary protocols, and
much less on anything that would be internationalized - but no one on the
BOF coordination call(*) this week could remember if the IETF ever having
that specific thing.

Have we?

Thanks in advance for clues ...

Spencer

(*) to be fair, not all the IESG and IAB were able to participate in the
BOF coordination call, but most of us were present.