IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [I18nrp] Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-unicode11-05.txt> (IDNA2008 and Unicode 11.0.0) to Informational RFC

"Patrik Fältström " <paf@frobbit.se> Fri, 07 December 2018 06:16 UTC

Return-Path: <paf@frobbit.se>
X-Original-To: i18nrp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i18nrp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B22124BF6; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 22:16:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.722
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.722 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=frobbit.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9t5VtEc2qTVP; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 22:16:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.frobbit.se (mail.frobbit.se [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffe::176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9932412008A; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 22:16:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.165.72.241] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffc:0:431:eda0:2df6:6662]) by mail.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F79B2353B; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 07:16:04 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=frobbit.se; s=mail; t=1544163364; bh=Jevz8T18iPB3wYIAlkoobfq/4bNH18HwjYSPKvyveJs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=iJbXZ6ZMdvS8QQTd/CQfE6SEcTgGhHB/83WSszH3oDYYa9fS0ln49VKT3LLcrH7Gr vG6bl9/J4j6ri2nJmevHB39idfiuuLWOlL07fFpKMvkfaPBeIE5rYXewJVm9y7M3ew KxHpNSdakVqXpQDTDq9pzzF2rIIi34JM9/lUAULg=
From: "Patrik =?utf-8?b?RsOkbHRzdHLDtm0=?=" <paf@frobbit.se>
To: "John C Klensin" <john@jck.com>
Cc: "Larry Masinter" <LMM@acm.org>, i18nrp@ietf.org, idna-update@ietf.org, "Asmus Freytag" <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>, "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2018 07:16:03 +0100
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.12.2r5568)
Message-ID: <BD925131-58F8-457B-B553-B15AC87D274E@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <50A496896DE57696A5184DC2@PSB>
References: <154385119878.18333.5085298134102919486.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <FF6F9EB9-C73B-4EC0-AC4F-3E3BFBABA0AB@vpnc.org> <8E20D432-01B0-4B52-80BB-3348C5FE73AF@vpnc.org> <CC73FC25-92FC-4822-B267-15C41CE450F2@frobbit.se> <D81CDFF3-8CDF-4168-9CEA-E8DC3A133B73@vpnc.org> <217ede0e-ea1f-bb31-a276-f8c618c71278@ix.netcom.com> <8885EE4C-412E-4337-A099-66354A36CEA1@vpnc.org> <EC12FDAE-4ABD-4AD3-A35A-B39D2C8A0AE0@frobbit.se> <f4417f80-fa86-11e6-baf7-2365981e18b1@ix.netcom.com> <48A2A546-4FEA-4060-8706-34D210B2ABAF@frobbit.se> <055301d48dc8$0ea95120$2bfbf360$@acm.org> <07CB0B3B-E48A-40CD-BBC9-E6CAA2FB29F0@frobbit.se> <50A496896DE57696A5184DC2@PSB>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_3D7A819C-F71A-4D06-8F40-4DCD648AB53A_="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i18nrp/NF-9g4FFI19pmUkmcK6KVPbimGM>
Subject: Re: [I18nrp] Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-unicode11-05.txt> (IDNA2008 and Unicode 11.0.0) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: i18nrp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internationalization Review Procedures <i18nrp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i18nrp>, <mailto:i18nrp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i18nrp/>
List-Post: <mailto:i18nrp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i18nrp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i18nrp>, <mailto:i18nrp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2018 06:16:09 -0000

On 7 Dec 2018, at 7:12, John C Klensin wrote:

> But I still believe that, with appropriate qualification, Larry is still correct.

I think we dive into the details here.

1. I think the ability (for example) copy and paste, respond to, click on, save in bookmarks etc is the most important global requirement

2. The ability to type, to enter via a keyboard, read on a bus, etc is secondary and have localization issues so very much different than (1)

My point was that because of this, I think retypable is very very very much different than other, global, requirements, and the latter should not (I think) muddy the waters of the first requirement I list above.

   paf

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email