Re: [I18nrp] Was there ever a formal I18N directorate?
S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Thu, 07 June 2018 21:41 UTC
Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: i18nrp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i18nrp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 681A013119C
for <i18nrp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 14:41:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.79
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.79 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key)
reason="fail (message has been altered)"
header.d=opendkim.org
header.b=yqd1lh+Q; dkim=fail (1024-bit key)
reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
header.b=Vd/TU4E9
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id G1JrxaXkWTE2 for <i18nrp@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 7 Jun 2018 14:41:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com
[IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E8313112B
for <i18nrp@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 14:41:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([197.224.108.158])
(authenticated bits=0)
by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w57LfPFm026476
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Thu, 7 Jun 2018 14:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org;
s=mail2010; t=1528407697; x=1528494097;
bh=h9qP1VHBQNSuAl7hIWgBLFH478hiIafTmbBVrwTWvAs=;
h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References;
b=yqd1lh+QgC/3voPTDlm306QwPgiHK53sJBqXZRK/mmKbuND0Laku1MPXNizGsh4U2
9hnOkdh/iEokcawYvcheRB1n3NPtgqIzDuGZYqplxYvVo6ATclU/fICvja1Qv6y4Kh
4VAYVBeuAbA63J1PuFHAH4ud7ZgYgsAJcBUUk12k=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail;
t=1528407697; x=1528494097; i=@elandsys.com;
bh=h9qP1VHBQNSuAl7hIWgBLFH478hiIafTmbBVrwTWvAs=;
h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References;
b=Vd/TU4E9P1f050jGYWoJgL67st6a+oUGJRqHGV1BZvcVWRXoedkeooAVKn7C5Ukdb
A1VEc2lTb7Iw5ZBICNgs9bKUqNQamRrGlgyOGihF3GCzMPyXNbuhoVEP7bX+9aAuUB
z5AXUtDMECC5V2BPOJy+OMEoilU5yUOLSCiUtuRI=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20180607143121.12b87318@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 14:40:31 -0700
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, i18nrp@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-cx+MOWL4Xiunph7ZS2q+OsJWzR25h3dtSgpSqBWSWXGQ@mail.g
mail.com>
References: <CAKKJt-cx+MOWL4Xiunph7ZS2q+OsJWzR25h3dtSgpSqBWSWXGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i18nrp/SNpRfyFECyd2WENKixSjxmo-17g>
Subject: Re: [I18nrp] Was there ever a formal I18N directorate?
X-BeenThere: i18nrp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internationalization Review Procedures <i18nrp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i18nrp>,
<mailto:i18nrp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i18nrp/>
List-Post: <mailto:i18nrp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i18nrp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i18nrp>,
<mailto:i18nrp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 21:41:48 -0000
Hi Spencer, At 10:49 AM 07-06-2018, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote: >That's not surprising - I've done a lot of work on binary protocols, >and much less on anything that would be internationalized - but no >one on the BOF coordination call(*) this week could remember if the >IETF ever having that specific thing. There was AppDir. Some of the reviews which the directorate performed were about internationalization. Regards, S. Moonesamy
- [I18nrp] Was there ever a formal I18N directorate? Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [I18nrp] Was there ever a formal I18N directo… John C Klensin
- Re: [I18nrp] Was there ever a formal I18N directo… Nico Williams
- Re: [I18nrp] Was there ever a formal I18N directo… S Moonesamy
- Re: [I18nrp] Was there ever a formal I18N directo… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [I18nrp] Was there ever a formal I18N directo… Spencer Dawkins at IETF