[I18nrp] Additional input needed for i18nRP BOF

[Adam Roach <[e-mail]>]

On today's BOF approval call, the IESG and IAB had an in-depth 
discussion of the i18nRP BOF proposal. One of the topics that was most 
discussed is a concern that the BOF does not have a clear path to 
success, largely because the proposal has very little discussion of 
proposed potential outcomes. While we do not expect the proponents to 
presuppose an outcome, we believe that achieving a positive outcome 
requires one or more specific proposals to serve as a basis for the 
conversation.

At the same time, the volume of traffic on the IETF mailing list on this 
topic does seem to demonstrate that there is interest in discussing 
topics related to internationalization. The ART area directors have 
therefore provisionally approved the BOF, subject to the proponents 
and/or any other interested parties providing concrete proposals as a 
basis for discussion.

Concretely, this means that the secretariat has been requested to 
schedule a one-hour slot for the Montreal meeting for the proposed BOF. 
If no concrete proposals for procedural approaches to address the issues 
described by the BOF proponents are available by Wednesday, June 13th, 
the secretariat will be requested to remove the BOF from the schedule.

Although it did not come up during the call, I personally wish to point 
out that open-ended brainstorming sessions without concrete proposals 
are typically handled as unofficial side-meetings (either in person or 
virtually). If the BOF proponents wish to maintain the open-ended 
brainstorm session described in the current proposal, the side meeting 
scheduling mechanism remains available; and I would be happy to help out 
should any difficulties occur in using that mechanism.

Please send proposals and any other follow-up messages to [e-mail]

/a