Re: [I18nrp] Additional input needed for i18nRP BOF

[Brian E Carpenter <[e-mail]>]

On 07/06/2018 06:23, Adam Roach wrote:
> On 6/6/18 8:58 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
>> I had hoped to see an open discussion in the weeks between now
>> and the start of the IETF meeting but, while I have some ideas,
>> the absence of specific proposals in the BOF proposal was
>> deliberate.
> 
> 
> I'd like to add two points of clarification, to make sure we're not 
> talking past each other.
> 
>  1. This is not a request to revise the BOF request itself. We are
>     looking for concrete process proposals within the next week on this
>     mailing list.

Isn't there one fairly straightforward proposal already implied in
the mail threads? Something like:

* Before the following IETF, the IESG (via a suitable AD) should
create an I18N Directorate which should perform I18N reviews
on all drafts during IETF Last Call, and provide advice and
assistance to draft authors and WGs earlier in the process when
possible.

    Brian

> 
>  2. The proposals that are developed within the next week do not
>     necessarily need to be those that are presented in Montreal. We are
>     looking for a guarantee that there will be at least one concrete
>     proposal going into the BOF. If a more preferred idea is proposed
>     between next Wednesday and the meeting, it could be used as the
>     basis for conversation instead of the initial proposals.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> /a
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> i18nRP mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i18nrp
>