IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [I18nrp] FWD: Re: [Idna-update] [I18n-discuss] draft-faltstrom-unicode11, i18n "directorate", and related issues

Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com> Wed, 05 December 2018 18:12 UTC

Return-Path: <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>
X-Original-To: i18nrp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i18nrp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 567AF130EFC for <i18nrp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 10:12:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ix.netcom.com; domainkeys=pass (2048-bit key) header.from=asmusf@ix.netcom.com header.d=ix.netcom.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ATiZ5lH5F-Py for <i18nrp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 10:12:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26699130EFF for <i18nrp@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 10:12:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ix.netcom.com; s=dk12062016; t=1544033524; bh=/Y9X42XThQRbMa9XYt8S4yK3n+7OKAUs5CTC dfU4Gh4=; h=Received:Subject:To:References:From:Message-ID:Date: User-Agent:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Language: X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; b=sEqimfyTjRJorMOXaajlWjTvbSKqkW1IB cT4GT0VQutjMm8OJxRQmAJ7/L+cNp/MOtQMJUG7tlG3oO5Un/j1T24z09l6bAVaPk74 9g9el4xGZVnCq4mfCbQZtM2YyuBnfh/tvMQpK4J5ZVjkWffh+FgMotyJ171UiAZja/v gJezvcuMW9H3RxupDev58kDipEAf2JoadZJOHMbMnUfij4c2OcOhsE20IwUNTW90Ag1 YnvSGsUVrnTLcaiHHsEvuB7NfqSWX0FmN8EDIyAywhXGERkNluN196Q0L6HclFrDdsb Z4Ylu82kWaSGh9DwLunS4MSA3pWXu9X19Uw13xuow==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk12062016; d=ix.netcom.com; b=GACry7E0cQyfAQX5DCRYoSL6EtMecw2oy17/jFY4CH2FYRofFHwRYKJpt48DW9nc56sUl7AyzbMPkTKxqtsM8TsFqZ/0+2ETEYKmYH8lK14ebwsdZ40CJp7M8W6aM875DkWnw2Mk95kygp5Fj+7Us775PhWNUIMUAk1kak1za0fXkGTV35Oe8m6RySo0zM2OswbMfdL/3sqTMkuJd2gmWm8FjnxSYo0kf7ZMEP+C2fHI4MwKQpIAnzC7sax+pVnJbYCe+ZN7HIRb8Wrl7+CwZyu/NpaDvmC8gpYqtG1XQEFiviiMP4UxX4evbNkFRQYvyMfp72DurbMKSEDBuh/fLw==; h=Received:Subject:To:References:From:Message-ID:Date:User-Agent:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Language:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [174.21.171.131] (helo=[192.168.0.5]) by elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4) (envelope-from <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>) id 1gUbeU-000A1V-Qf for i18nrp@ietf.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2018 13:12:03 -0500
To: i18nrp@ietf.org
References: <FF58A82A9FC582B643CD76B4@PSB> <6.2.5.6.2.20181204185928.1085a3d0@elandnews.com> <20181205155025.35bpnwne3tqw6i7h@mx4.yitter.info>
From: Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <e78acfde-ac27-a67b-a90a-68f517166092@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 10:12:05 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20181205155025.35bpnwne3tqw6i7h@mx4.yitter.info>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------245B542F83BF3EF3052DEBCB"
Content-Language: en-US
X-ELNK-Trace: 464f085de979d7246f36dc87813833b28d93432b0f0788b97d708df602933502e4106c190e74b5ee350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 174.21.171.131
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i18nrp/kkZL4n1Bk9UGTPLMfjcrfPlLAzY>
Subject: Re: [I18nrp] FWD: Re: [Idna-update] [I18n-discuss] draft-faltstrom-unicode11, i18n "directorate", and related issues
X-BeenThere: i18nrp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internationalization Review Procedures <i18nrp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i18nrp>, <mailto:i18nrp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i18nrp/>
List-Post: <mailto:i18nrp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i18nrp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i18nrp>, <mailto:i18nrp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 18:12:09 -0000

On 12/5/2018 7:50 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 07:30:39PM -0800, S Moonesamy wrote:
>> I gather that directorate is not an exact fit if it operates as a review
>> team.  A directorate review cannot block a draft.  As Ted pointed out, it
>> would be up to the Area Director to take the decision on whether to "block"
>> a draft.
> But of course, an AD could block a draft on the grounds that s/he
> doesn't have enough information yet because s/he didn't have a
> directorate yet that was sufficient to provide needed advice on
> whether a document can proceed.  I don't see any reason why that would
> be problematic, and I see lots of reasons why this process-lawyering
> is.  People are trying to do the right thing, using the resources they
> have, in a way to minimise thrash around this topic, and attempting to
> make the process work one way or the other by insisting on
> rule-following is, I submit, quite likely to make things worse.
>
> A
>
^ That

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email