Re: [I18nrp] Additional input needed for i18nRP BOF

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Wed, 06 June 2018 21:06 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: i18nrp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i18nrp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8878130DD6 for <i18nrp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 14:06:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.88
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.88 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0Y9S5qt8AXqY for <i18nrp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 14:06:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B31C4130DCF for <i18nrp@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 14:06:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Svantevit.local (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w56L6Jnm032818 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 6 Jun 2018 16:06:20 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be Svantevit.local
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, i18nrp@ietf.org
References: <f997170c-3062-0241-e58d-7a3415fba983@nostrum.com> <CE6F76BB323F1555D6B217A5@PSB> <9ecf8b7a-d086-1c56-03fb-6773aed332c6@nostrum.com> <4DA478C4C99396556E1B3EF1@PSB>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <a31e91ff-c78c-6a7c-fe8c-70b9563312f7@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 16:06:14 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4DA478C4C99396556E1B3EF1@PSB>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i18nrp/zSsAQndKj7LYr6NTsp1pIMv2cbk>
Subject: Re: [I18nrp] Additional input needed for i18nRP BOF
X-BeenThere: i18nrp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internationalization Review Procedures <i18nrp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i18nrp>, <mailto:i18nrp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i18nrp/>
List-Post: <mailto:i18nrp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i18nrp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i18nrp>, <mailto:i18nrp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2018 21:06:24 -0000

On 6/6/18 3:58 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
> Brian's suggestion is more realistic and I hope more palatable
> but my personal view is that, without significantly more details
> and framework, such a Directorate would turn into another
> example of something we've tried before and that has failed.


I'd rather not see this effort aim for failure and, upon hitting it, 
declare that its goals have been met. I trust that you will attempt to 
provide these additional details?

/a