Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption
Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com> Tue, 12 January 2016 16:09 UTC
Return-Path: <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A5F1B2AFF for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 08:09:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8GgU0BEr19OZ for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 08:09:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21AE81B2ACE for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 08:09:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CCV69053; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:08:59 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DFWEML705-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.142) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:08:59 +0000
Received: from DFWEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.50]) by dfweml705-chm ([10.193.5.142]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 08:08:48 -0800
From: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "i2nsf@ietf.org" <i2nsf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption
Thread-Index: AdFMfpIrlSnoJPdlT7SaF1vgplQ0mQApuhEwAAt9WZA=
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:08:47 +0000
Message-ID: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F657DD411A@dfweml701-chm>
References: <00bc01d14c7e$95eb9690$c1c2c3b0$@olddog.co.uk> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BEE4EDD@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BEE4EDD@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.143.236]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020202.5695251C.0097, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 59916c0c0daad770f07939d44a0e9e0b
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/3C8sDIRq7njyqu5bdU6AqtvSNc0>
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption
X-BeenThere: i2nsf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "*I2NSF: Interface to Network Security Functions mailing list*" <i2nsf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2nsf/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:09:05 -0000
Dan, Thank you very much for the comments. I agree that the document should be "Informational" instead of "standard track". Linda -----Original Message----- From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan) Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 4:43 AM To: adrian@olddog.co.uk; i2nsf@ietf.org Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption Hi, I support the adoption, but: - if the WG consensus is to go ahead with two documents, and this consensus is blessed by the AD, then we should split the milestones as well - both documents were published with the intended status of 'Standards track' which is odd for Use Cases and Problem Statement ,as well as for Gap Analysis documents. Unless there is a good justification (which I am interested to hear) I suggest that they are adopted with the intended status of Informational Regards, Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel > Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 4:45 PM > To: i2nsf@ietf.org > Subject: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption > > Hi Working group, > > We had a working group milestone before Christmas to "Adopt use Cases, > problem statement, and gap analysis as WG document". > > Per the discussions in Yokohama, we struggled to compact all of this > information into a single document and plan to move ahead with two > documents. The first is a combined problem statement and use case > document, the second is a gap analysis of existing IETF technologies. > > We checked with the AD and she is happy that we take this approach. > _______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list I2nsf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
- [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption Adrian Farrel
- Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption Adrian Farrel
- [I2nsf] Support the adaptation of draft-hares-i2n… Xialiang (Frank)
- [I2nsf] Support the adaptation of draft-hares-i2n… Xialiang (Frank)
- Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA
- Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption Susan Hares
- Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption christian.jacquenet
- Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption Zarny, Myo
- Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption Linda Dunbar
- Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption Susan Hares
- Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption Adrian Farrel
- Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption Susan Hares
- Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption Shaibal Chakrabarty
- [I2nsf] 答复: Working Group document adoption Youjianjie
- Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption ANTONIO AGUSTIN PASTOR PERALES
- Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption John Strassner
- [I2nsf] 答复: Working Group document adoption Xiajinwei
- Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption Adrian Farrel