Re: [I2nsf] need more review and support to close the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm

"yangpenglin@chinamobile.com" <yangpenglin@chinamobile.com> Fri, 22 July 2022 04:43 UTC

Return-Path: <yangpenglin@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB76C13485C for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 21:43:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mZFBXfjBt7Qc for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 21:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta2.chinamobile.com (cmccmta2.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D345EC0657D2 for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 21:42:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.85]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app05-12005 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee562da2abfab0-4fb18; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 12:42:41 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee562da2abfab0-4fb18
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from cmcc-PC (unknown[223.72.70.6]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvrnew03-12028 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2efc62da2abeba1-a0013; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 12:42:40 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2efc62da2abeba1-a0013
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 12:42:39 +0800
From: "yangpenglin@chinamobile.com" <yangpenglin@chinamobile.com>
To: "Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>, tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com>, "i2nsf@ietf.org" <i2nsf@ietf.org>
Cc: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, Jeongnyeon Kim <eroica@skku.edu>, skku-iotlab-members <skku-iotlab-members@googlegroups.com>, "Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
References: <CO1PR13MB49200B723C19BDC266EA98EC85869@CO1PR13MB4920.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>, <BYAPR08MB487221C91BF204B34F337304B3869@BYAPR08MB4872.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>, <CO1PR13MB4920C96E21FDD1536B27A0A685869@CO1PR13MB4920.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>, <62D03D72.4070409@btconnect.com>, <CAPK2DeyWWy=4sbpr7+UHDveJM7FBcdDS77QLk5X7wT3HALV9dA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.16.188[en]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2022072212423913030812@chinamobile.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart426445240338_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/92GCpRL6Ac_AgYWE_bNFI_4GcJk>
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] need more review and support to close the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm
X-BeenThere: i2nsf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "*I2NSF: Interface to Network Security Functions mailing list*" <i2nsf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2nsf/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 04:43:30 -0000

Hi all,

This updated licensing seems a "defensive" policy, which in my opinion is all right. I also reviewed draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm-21, and have no objection for WGLC of this draft.

BR.
Penglin

 
From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Date: 2022-07-16 10:13
To: tom petch; i2nsf@ietf.org
CC: Linda Dunbar; Susan Hares; Jeongnyeon Kim; skku-iotlab-members; Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] need more review and support to close the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm
Hi Tom and I2NSF WG,
Let me report the status of IPR Declaration on I2NSF Consumer-Facing Interface YANG Data Model Draft and other drafts.
My SKKU Patent Attorney (Mr. Jeongnyeon Kim) posted an IPR declaration on this  I2NSF Consumer-Facing Interface YANG Data Model Draft.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/5694/

According to my request, Mr. Jeongnyeon Kim has requested the update of the licensing last week as follows:
-----
If this standard is adopted, Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU) will not assert any patents owned or controlled by SKKU against any party for making, using, selling, importing or offering for sale a product that implements the standard, provided, however that SKKU retains the right to assert its patents (including the right to claim past royalties) against any party that asserts a patent it owns or controls (either directly or indirectly) against SKKU or any of SKKU's affiliates or successors in title or against any products of SKKU or any products of any of SKKU's affiliates either alone or in combination with other products; and SKKU retains the right to assert its patents against any product or portion thereof that is not necessary for compliance with the standard. Royalty-bearing licenses will be available to anyone who prefers that option.
-----
The above licensing was agreed by our I2NSF WG before.
This update is expected to be done next week.

For other I2NSF WG drafts, the update requests of the same correction of the licensing text 
have been submitted by Mr. Jeongnyeon Kim.
- I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model Draft
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/5689/

- I2NSF NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model Draft
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/5690/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/5691/

- I2NSF Monitoring Interface YANG Data Model Draft
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/5692/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/5693/

- I2NSF Registration Interface YANG Data Model Draft
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/5695/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/5696/

For my individual I2NSF drafts, the same updates were requested by him.

Thanks.

Best Regards,
Paul

On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 1:00 AM tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com> wrote:
On 12/07/2022 18:44, Linda Dunbar wrote:
> Sue,
>
> Thank you very much for the offer.
>
> The unsolved comments are from Tom Petch: Re: [I2nsf] WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm-16<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/d_Wk5fH35Jo_cdz4D0QZN5VNhFA/>
> There are several responses to address Tom Petch's comments. Just Tom hasn't sent feedback if he is satisfied with the response.

Linda,

I am sorry I have not got back to you; I did not realise that I was 
holding things up.  Meanwhile, another problem has arise.  Most of the 
activity on the WG mailing list recently has been ten IPR claims, one of 
which is against this I-D, for an unpublished patent, with possible 
Royalty/Fee.

Similar claims were made three years ago, before I was involved, and the 
WG pushed back on this, that the usual reciprocity clause would be ok, 
possible Royalty/Fee would not be.  Were those who pushed back three 
years ago to see the latest claims, I would expect them to push back 
again.  To see the terms of these latest claims I find disappointing.

I do not understand the details of the IPR claims; I am used to a claim 
being made against each successive version of an I-D up to an including 
the RFC.  Here, some at least of the claims would appear to relate to 
earlier versions and not the current one but since much of the text is 
in common, the choice of version seems irrelevant.  Also, some of the 
claims specify the relevant sections and one would appear to include the 
IANA Considerations which seems unusual while some of the claims are in 
CJK script which I do not read.

I realise that the IETF takes no position on IPR claims, that the WG 
members have to decide whether or not to proceed with the work in the 
presence of a claim.  On one such previous occasion, the WG was 
satisfied that there was prior art which would invalidate the claim and 
so the work went ahead regardless of the claim; such a step is not 
possible with an unpublished patent.

July is a hectic time for me so I shall look at the revised I-Ds but not 
just yet.  Whether or not I want to participate in the presence of the 
IPR claims, I am unsure.

Tom Petch

>
> Linda
>
> From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 12:21 PM
> To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>; i2nsf@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [I2nsf] need more review and support to close the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm
>
> Linda:
>
> I will review the document by  Thursday (7/14) and send in a review of the document.   Would you let me know what WG LC comments were not addressed?
>
> Cheers, Sue
>
> From: I2nsf <i2nsf-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:i2nsf-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Linda Dunbar
> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 1:17 PM
> To: i2nsf@ietf.org<mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
> Subject: [I2nsf] need more review and support to close the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm
>
>
> I2NF WG,
>
> draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm WGLC was inconclusive due to lack of support and some LC comments not properly addressed. There appeared to be limited reviews of the document during the WGLC
> See the discussion history: [I2nsf] WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm-16<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmailarchive.ietf.org%2Farch%2Fmsg%2Fi2nsf%2FMFOohjnJ9fbylLB9eyccMRhrp04%2F&data=05%7C01%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7Cc95feb0ac382419474b808da642adfd0%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C637932432560667469%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=f9Jlz0HgQw7NO%2BKer356WyaN9toprO8WCPEUBGhkAXI%3D&reserved=0>
>
> To proceed to publication more reviews and support from the WG for publication is needed.
> We really appreciate more people reviewing the document, especially the people who are not the authors.
>
> Thank you
> Linda Dunbar
>

_______________________________________________
I2nsf mailing list
I2nsf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf