Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Tue, 12 January 2016 15:09 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFFB21B2A6C for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 07:09:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -96.257
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-96.257 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hlm9KhWuAbAQ for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 07:09:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (unknown [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C78F1A0127 for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 07:09:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=74.43.47.177;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: 'DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA' <diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com>, i2nsf@ietf.org
References: <00bc01d14c7e$95eb9690$c1c2c3b0$@olddog.co.uk> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BEE4EDD@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <5D470630-C4D4-4C5D-990F-7BF3A1C887EA@telefonica.com>
In-Reply-To: <5D470630-C4D4-4C5D-990F-7BF3A1C887EA@telefonica.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 10:09:23 -0500
Message-ID: <014301d14d4b$40f6b110$c2e41330$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0144_01D14D21.5820A910"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIFmyK2oaL34DaaLPmC/crfuvYzVwJjtqzlAS1pBqCectXlYA==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/BPyfRs4B5g6XiRpvPFFKOWE8BP0>
Cc: adrian@olddog.co.uk, dromasca@avaya.com
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption
X-BeenThere: i2nsf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "*I2NSF: Interface to Network Security Functions mailing list*" <i2nsf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2nsf/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 15:09:42 -0000

I2NSF WG: 

 

As co-author, I support adoption of both drafts. 

 

On Dan’s point, my understanding from the charter is that both of these documents were going to be WG documents that would not be published as RFCs.  This way of handling these documents is just fine or going to informational document published by IESG is also fine.  Adrian and Linda indicate the purpose of these documents is to help speed along the creation of the framework, models, and other charter items. 

 

Sue 

 

From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 9:55 AM
To: i2nsf@ietf.org
Cc: adrian@olddog.co.uk; dromasca@avaya.com
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption

 

I support the adoption and the compacting strategy, and Dan’s suggestion as well. 

 

Be goode,

 

On 12 Jan 2016, at 03:43 , Romascanu, Dan (Dan) <dromasca@avaya.com> wrote:

 

Hi,

I support the adoption, but: 

- if the WG consensus is to go ahead with two documents, and this consensus is blessed by the AD, then we should split the milestones as well
- both documents were published with the intended status of 'Standards track' which is odd for Use Cases and Problem Statement ,as well as for Gap Analysis documents. Unless there is a good justification (which I am interested to hear) I suggest that they are adopted with the intended status of Informational

Regards,

Dan





-----Original Message-----
From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 4:45 PM
To: i2nsf@ietf.org
Subject: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption

Hi Working group,

We had a working group milestone before Christmas to "Adopt use Cases,
problem statement, and gap analysis as WG document".

Per the discussions in Yokohama, we struggled to compact all of this
information into a single document and plan to move ahead with two
documents. The first is a combined problem statement and use case
document, the second is a gap analysis of existing IETF technologies.

We checked with the AD and she is happy that we take this approach.


_______________________________________________
I2nsf mailing list
I2nsf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf

 

--
"Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno"

Dr Diego R. Lopez
Telefonica I+D
http://people.tid.es/diego.lopez/

e-mail: diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com
Tel:    +34 913 129 041
Mobile: +34 682 051 091
----------------------------------

 

 

  _____  


Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.

The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it.

Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição