IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [I2nsf] Stability call for draft-ietf-i2nsf-terminology-03

John Strassner <strazpdj@gmail.com> Thu, 25 May 2017 20:20 UTC

Return-Path: <strazpdj@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C891270FC for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 May 2017 13:20:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OlWkQ3Jhw2MN for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 May 2017 13:20:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22e.google.com (mail-lf0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C55B126D46 for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 May 2017 13:20:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id a5so76361228lfh.2 for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 May 2017 13:20:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=D2WPeeD3JVGYedTMj5BxygBpHz64xhroYt6dTPo+QM4=; b=Kb4tVtr81jrtHtBkUp2bkVnXQnd7RZVuvuoHO280VytJ9QFdvAcURUpZ3SIWCV22P6 AyS7BYPekHd9tkLh1yLIzFKVL6BtmOHfcInw4n+hsqOigk76vWeYpPVb6m0ta6DwusfY Pdl53RbzFV1Aj1sJqBj2sLRffM8RYRBp5fqpdYx/pcDzCtKgona3SG2jUCeV63yPSOcQ iCLzmdjRlWCXS3+HCJ+/wybQIe7296zluznt0MEvsLKfPY82VJACr0tf/7xJo8/WRXwS Gad50JkJqsX/4lpjDTJEfHTYEim2N+ztGA56qdpQ7nkNRkhozwBTXIXC4juJg4dAGCDa VI6A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=D2WPeeD3JVGYedTMj5BxygBpHz64xhroYt6dTPo+QM4=; b=lPiANzfjCwKVB7+Wwckw62QuoP6x4TImolq2/CODzeOo/m5PO42RHhRkd8YmE2do2A vIIx/YBli0kn/5EhCKFKZ49bN17lFl8PoNBHXiZcrroWPSNTi/RMeaH0ZWs4KJVa/dIc eN4rrbZJMviFAkO+vXB7R6v13+BbGnYgZ+WzAGCe444tSrQ4fNPvdJlxNmig7HKlgc57 Yoh+wIDfeUu5mx49s+n6tCeMePgaWk5Xhg2HOcktzdSefbVqTKAgW9x0Q7mJAOJ7hJaD p+ny4fPTixx0u3R0icgOURyQpv81yuJmq31Mi9OiWESlktREI4884pruTXPOyQZLHgnH T0vw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcD4XRNoBuZIwOMuTdPkIAhCKQj2OIbjlC/cJzm9a1QAxff4Ipp5 9RsIIVjRLiBK/mjmEQZqNM0lQE2lb+wU
X-Received: by 10.46.20.67 with SMTP id 3mr12543388lju.54.1495743615168; Thu, 25 May 2017 13:20:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.225.149 with HTTP; Thu, 25 May 2017 13:20:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <082801d2cffc$ce81ffa0$6b85fee0$@olddog.co.uk>
References: <082801d2cffc$ce81ffa0$6b85fee0$@olddog.co.uk>
From: John Strassner <strazpdj@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 13:20:14 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJwYUrGjTdjjwOiK=zdOFiCiDQxEoKHyn=60+GAcNrPQ3P6Tdg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045fc1a6db76eb05505ef27a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/Fw4YUYydYRr33oJXudCI11C2mGo>
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Stability call for draft-ietf-i2nsf-terminology-03
X-BeenThere: i2nsf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "*I2NSF: Interface to Network Security Functions mailing list*" <i2nsf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2nsf/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 20:20:19 -0000

Hi Adrian,

I vote #4 (Yes, I think this is something we can use as our foundation).
Please note that we have (at least) some additional terminology to sort out
concerning attestation. Prior to that, I plan on doing a thorough review.
Any comments that you have are of course more than welcome!

best,
John

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi WG,
>
> The framework document got updated to match the terminology document which
> was a
> good first test.
>
> Now we would like to make sure that the terminology as currently
> documented is
> something we can all work with. Hence this call for review and opinion.
>
> Please respond to the question "Is the terminology draft stable?"
>
> 1. No. Major changes are needed.
> If you do this you are duty bound to point out the problems, and you are
> expected to help solve them.
>
> 2. Yes, but I haven't really read it.
> If you do this we will chuckle and probably make you stand up at the next
> WG
> meeting.
>
> 3. Yes, but I have some minor concerns.
> You'll need to point them out and help fix them, but we will still be able
> to
> consider the document as a good basis for future work.
>
> 4. Yes, I think this is something we can use as our foundation.
>
> Note that Linda and I don't intend last-calling this document for a bit as
> we
> suspect new terms will show up as other work progresses.
>
> Cheers,
> Adrian
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> I2nsf mailing list
> I2nsf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
>



-- 
regards,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email