Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption
"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Tue, 12 January 2016 20:07 UTC
Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 367001A8844 for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 12:07:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -96.257
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-96.257 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qEWus7yNNgHQ for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 12:07:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (unknown [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5AF71A8843 for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 12:07:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=74.43.47.177;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
References: <00bc01d14c7e$95eb9690$c1c2c3b0$@olddog.co.uk> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BEE4EDD@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <5D470630-C4D4-4C5D-990F-7BF3A1C887EA@telefonica.com> <014301d14d4b$40f6b110$c2e41330$@ndzh.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BEE5583@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <019e01d14d56$cb58b690$620a23b0$@ndzh.com> <015701d14d63$c5805cc0$50811640$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <015701d14d63$c5805cc0$50811640$@olddog.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 15:07:25 -0500
Message-ID: <026a01d14d74$dc9432e0$95bc98a0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_026B_01D14D4A.F3BFB180"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIFmyK2oaL34DaaLPmC/crfuvYzVwJjtqzlAS1pBqACq1Xz/wHk5LJ/AdbkjSACDMmT554vivRQ
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/KSCaI6SF1aaEvQhAZsiFCnPyRGA>
Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption
X-BeenThere: i2nsf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "*I2NSF: Interface to Network Security Functions mailing list*" <i2nsf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2nsf/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 20:07:31 -0000
Adrian: Thank you for the information. I’ll collect the rest of the comments. By the way, I have no knowledge of IPR on either draft. Sue From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 1:05 PM To: 'Susan Hares' Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption Hi Sue, No need to make work for yourself (unless you want to). None of the comments (so far) is so significant that it can't wait until after adoption. So I suggest: - let the poll complete - adopt the docs - make the updates Adrian From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares Sent: 12 January 2016 16:32 To: 'Romascanu, Dan (Dan)'; 'DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA'; i2nsf@ietf.org Cc: adrian@olddog.co.uk Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption Dan: I agree that informational is the right status for these documents. I will submit a revision with that change and addressing other comments on the list. Sue From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan) Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 10:17 AM To: Susan Hares; 'DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA'; i2nsf@ietf.org Cc: adrian@olddog.co.uk Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption Well, the charter says: Ø This document will initially be produced for reference as a living list to track and record discussions: the working group may decide to not publish this document as an RFC. So, the WG may decide to not publish or may decide to publish the documents (as they are two now). In the case we decide to publish, it seems to me that ‘Informational’ would be the right status. Let us set it ‘right’ then – it’s a different style of writing and a different approach in reviewing when we deal with Standards Track vs. Informational. If we do not publish it does not matter. Regards, Dan From: Susan Hares [mailto:shares@ndzh.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 5:09 PM To: 'DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA'; i2nsf@ietf.org Cc: adrian@olddog.co.uk; Romascanu, Dan (Dan) Subject: RE: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption I2NSF WG: As co-author, I support adoption of both drafts. On Dan’s point, my understanding from the charter is that both of these documents were going to be WG documents that would not be published as RFCs. This way of handling these documents is just fine or going to informational document published by IESG is also fine. Adrian and Linda indicate the purpose of these documents is to help speed along the creation of the framework, models, and other charter items. Sue
- [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption Adrian Farrel
- Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption Adrian Farrel
- [I2nsf] Support the adaptation of draft-hares-i2n… Xialiang (Frank)
- [I2nsf] Support the adaptation of draft-hares-i2n… Xialiang (Frank)
- Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA
- Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption Susan Hares
- Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption christian.jacquenet
- Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption Zarny, Myo
- Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption Linda Dunbar
- Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption Susan Hares
- Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption Adrian Farrel
- Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption Susan Hares
- Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption Shaibal Chakrabarty
- [I2nsf] 答复: Working Group document adoption Youjianjie
- Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption ANTONIO AGUSTIN PASTOR PERALES
- Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption John Strassner
- [I2nsf] 答复: Working Group document adoption Xiajinwei
- Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption Adrian Farrel