[I2nsf] Feedback for draft-hares-i2nsf-gap-analysis-01.txt
Myo Zarny <myo.zarny@gmail.com> Mon, 21 December 2015 22:25 UTC
Return-Path: <myo.zarny@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E9A1ACDEE for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:25:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.979
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.979 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_FREEMAIL_DOC_PDF=0.01, T_FREEMAIL_RVW_ATTCH=0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Og5gvYQJMK0B for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:25:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x22c.google.com (mail-io0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F12F41ACDED for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:25:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id 186so171223630iow.0 for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:25:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=4euUGvI7VONSlmudsRRT47gpOGfvBPR9xtobfxvQfQY=; b=UxeEZ5vJwMxkLwIV4FW6E4qcs6PItBMel0V1hKzfTCuuhPwGcW8SKxKcM6GeGyDj3n GKTnDfp5Mcp0ezXhnQ5FrdboR9OvCscAWFdMSvF4K2SEVuap0BnzqYBDy0Qv26ddqY5J C4NSzV1JX9jiPAwqKkDHXl10TcBCWYpzXe8B7BRfN4QXvZiWStfaGwC62zusKWcKBQ+x wi33KsmVwfSdpOiNtfAbW7ZsfsDJON7wN7R3DVcFvIie3cHvtz3efjlHQPflf1Aitf6/ 6Mvdt3lEGLDJe8MyrZzWz6z4F9IXBpdiDxPO3YGKjECovq1ILIJ4BxsJwT+pnG38oOsL OCwg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.162.21 with SMTP id l21mr20665689ioe.123.1450736710088; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:25:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.107.140.142 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:25:09 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 17:25:09 -0500
Message-ID: <CAFzRpbx07L0KWg8-Cu-is_yyJ-hL_vBUMFuYx1xRKRfKEpP8FQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Myo Zarny <myo.zarny@gmail.com>
To: i2nsf@ietf.org, shares@ndzh.com, rgm@labs.htt-consult.com, Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="001a11409d3e44a2f705276ff667"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/Y0POiKlbYBJ-vreOo58Tt2j9pr8>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:25:59 -0800
Subject: [I2nsf] Feedback for draft-hares-i2nsf-gap-analysis-01.txt
X-BeenThere: i2nsf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "*I2NSF: Interface to Network Security Functions mailing list*" <i2nsf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2nsf/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 22:25:14 -0000
Hi Sue, It's a very comprehensive document. Tremendous work. Thank you. Please see attached my feedback. It's marked up in a Word document for ease of consumption. I do have a few quibbles certain definitions, as mentioned in the doc. In particular, I don't agree with I2NSF requiring network controllers or orchestrators as written in Section 7.6. While I personally agree that it's preferable, I2NSF doesn't call only for such an architecture--certainly, not in a gap analysis document. The rest are just copy-edits. -- Regards, Myo