Re: [I2nsf] IPR Statements about I2NSF documents

[Paul Wouters <[e-mail]>]

On Thu, 27 Jun 2019, Yoav Nir wrote:

> OLD:
> Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory License to All Implementers with Possible Royalty/Fee
> 
> NEW:
> If this standard is adopted, Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU) will not assert any patents owned or controlled by SKKU against
> any party for making, using, selling, importing or offering for sale a product that implements the standard, provided,
> however that SKKU retains the right to assert its patents (including the right to claim past royalties) against any party
> that asserts a patent it owns or controls (either directly or indirectly) against SKKU or any of SKKU's affiliates or
> successors in title or against any products of SKKU or any products of any of SKKU's affiliates either alone or in
> combination with other products; and SKKU retains the right to assert its patents against any product or portion thereof that
> is not necessary for compliance with the standard. Royalty-bearing licenses will be available to anyone who prefers that
> option.

I'm not happy still, but at least now it is in line with other IPR
statements that make me unhappy, so I think there is no longer a reason
to change the document to avoid the IPR.

Paul