Re: [I2nsf] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-12: (with DISCUSS)

Magnus: 

Do you have specific transport people that you have assigned to work on this
review?  

It would probably be more effective to discuss these issues point by point
with the reviewers.  
As Paul has indicated, we would like to your issues in the context of the
high level capabilities of this  model. 

Thank you for letting us know you felt it was too high level and did not
have text to map to transport layer values.  Paul and his students have
implemented this to specific transport layer values to our view that it
could be implemented.    It is always difficult in a higher level data model
to determine how much detail to put in.   We'd love to work this issue with
your expert. 

Cheers, Sue  

-----Original Message-----
From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Magnus Westerlund
via Datatracker
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2020 9:49 AM
To: The IESG
Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model@ietf.org;
dunbar.ll@gmail.com; i2nsf-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [I2nsf] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on
draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-12: (with DISCUSS)

Magnus Westerlund has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-12: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I support Benjamin's discuss on the lack of semantics. It is impossible to
review the transport related parameters for correctness as they lack the
semantics to understand if they do map to protocol values.

This discuss is more a place holder to be aware that this document needs to
re-reviewed after having addressed by transport people.

_______________________________________________
I2nsf mailing list
I2nsf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf