Re: [I2nsf] [OPSAWG] is there any work in Ops Area for monitoring network functions?

[Linda Dunbar <[e-mail]>]

Tom, 

Thank you very much for the review and comments. So there is no duplicated work in OpsArea? 


Authors of the draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model: Can you please update the draft per Tom's comments. 

Linda. 

-----Original Message-----
From: tom petch [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 5:22 AM
To: Linda Dunbar <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] is there any work in Ops Area for monitoring network functions?

Linda

I looked at the draft and think that it needs some work before it is a YANG module:-)

- NMDA conformance is not mentioned

- the reference to RFC2119 is out of date

- the format for tree diagrams is now specified in RFC8340

- YANG import statements lack 'reference' as in
     import ietf-inet-types {
       prefix "inet";
       reference "RFC 6991 - Common YANG Data Types";

- YANG module has no copyright

- YANG module has (almost) no reference statements to tell the user (like me)  whereto go to understand it. look, for example, at draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang for a module that is well supplied with reference statements

- YANG module should reference the RFC from which it comes

- the one and only reference in the YANG module is
      reference
         "draft-zhang-i2nsf-info-model-monitoring-07";
but the I-D is
         draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-06
I do not understand

- where you reference an I-D, it needs a Note to the RFC Editor e.g.
 reference       "draft-zhang-i2nsf-info-model-monitoring-07";
becomes
 reference RFC YYYY "....."
-- Note to RFC Editor please replace YYYY with the number assigned to
         "draft-zhang-i2nsf-info-model-monitoring"

- IANA Considerations must be present

- Security Considerations must include the YANG template

HTH:-)

I am not on the I2NSF list.

Tom Petch

----- Original Message -----
From: "Linda Dunbar" <[e-mail]>
To: <[e-mail]>
Cc: <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2018 5:27 PM

> OpsaWG:
>
> I2NSF WG has a draft on data models (and information model) of
monitoring network security functions:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-0
6
>
> It includes data models to retrieve System Alarms, System Events,
counters, NSF Events/logs, etc.
>
> Want to see if there are data models already specified by Ops Area for
monitoring network functions which might have some common attributes that I2NSF can import.
>
> Thanks, Linda Dunbar
>
> From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 6:35 PM
> To: Linda Dunbar
<[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; Yoav Nir <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
> Cc: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>;
[e-mail]<mailto:skku_secu-brain_all@googlegr
oups.com>; Sangwon Hyun <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>;
Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
<[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
> Subject: Request for WG Adoption Call on NSF Monitoring Draft
>
> Hi Linda and Yoav,
> As we discussed the last Bangkok meeting, I have merged the two drafts 
> of Information Model and Data Model for NSF Monitoring into a new 
> draft called
draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-06:
>
> - Two Information and Data Model Drafts  . 
> draft-zhang-i2nsf-info-model-monitoring-07
>  . draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-05
>
> - A Merged Data Model Draft
>  . draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-06
>  .
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-0
6
>
> The NSF monitoring is very important to manage the I2NSF security
service system
> in a reliable and scalable fashion.
>
> Could you start a WG adoption call for this draft?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Best Regards,
> Paul
> --
> ===========================
> Mr. Jaehoon (Paul) Jeong, Ph.D.
> Associate Professor
> Department of Software
> Sungkyunkwan University
> Office: [phone]
> Email: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>,
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
> Personal Homepage:
http://iotlab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php<http://cpslab.skku.edu/p
eople-jaehoon-jeong.php>