IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Tue, 12 January 2016 10:43 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C92E21A8718 for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 02:43:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gwS9sNq6EZxz for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 02:43:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com (p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com [135.11.29.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 768881A86FB for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 02:43:26 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2D1AQDN15RW/yYyC4deGQEBAQEPAQEBAYJfK4E/BohTsy8BDYFmhg8CgSM4FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQ0AQEBAQMSKEsEAgEIDQQEAQELFAkHMhQJCAEBBAESCBqIDAGkY5sHAQEBAQEFAQEBAQEBAQEBGoZYhH2EV4NLgRsFlxMBlxeFPY5TIAEBQoQKcoUpAYEHAQEB
X-IPAS-Result: A2D1AQDN15RW/yYyC4deGQEBAQEPAQEBAYJfK4E/BohTsy8BDYFmhg8CgSM4FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQ0AQEBAQMSKEsEAgEIDQQEAQELFAkHMhQJCAEBBAESCBqIDAGkY5sHAQEBAQEFAQEBAQEBAQEBGoZYhH2EV4NLgRsFlxMBlxeFPY5TIAEBQoQKcoUpAYEHAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,557,1444708800"; d="scan'208";a="161092294"
Received: from unknown (HELO p-us1-erheast-smtpauth.us1.avaya.com) ([135.11.50.38]) by p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP; 12 Jan 2016 05:43:25 -0500
X-OutboundMail_SMTP: 1
Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC01.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.11]) by p-us1-erheast-out.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 12 Jan 2016 05:43:26 -0500
Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC01.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.11]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 11:43:23 +0100
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "i2nsf@ietf.org" <i2nsf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption
Thread-Index: AdFMfpIrlSnoJPdlT7SaF1vgplQ0mQApuhEw
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 10:43:22 +0000
Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BEE4EDD@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
References: <00bc01d14c7e$95eb9690$c1c2c3b0$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <00bc01d14c7e$95eb9690$c1c2c3b0$@olddog.co.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.48]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/l0lQUdNX5jHEOKb17UB3d6qwWVU>
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption
X-BeenThere: i2nsf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "*I2NSF: Interface to Network Security Functions mailing list*" <i2nsf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2nsf/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 10:43:27 -0000

Hi,

I support the adoption, but: 

- if the WG consensus is to go ahead with two documents, and this consensus is blessed by the AD, then we should split the milestones as well
- both documents were published with the intended status of 'Standards track' which is odd for Use Cases and Problem Statement ,as well as for Gap Analysis documents. Unless there is a good justification (which I am interested to hear) I suggest that they are adopted with the intended status of Informational

Regards,

Dan


> -----Original Message-----
> From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 4:45 PM
> To: i2nsf@ietf.org
> Subject: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption
> 
> Hi Working group,
> 
> We had a working group milestone before Christmas to "Adopt use Cases,
> problem statement, and gap analysis as WG document".
> 
> Per the discussions in Yokohama, we struggled to compact all of this
> information into a single document and plan to move ahead with two
> documents. The first is a combined problem statement and use case
> document, the second is a gap analysis of existing IETF technologies.
> 
> We checked with the AD and she is happy that we take this approach.
>

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status