[I2nsf] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-12: (with DISCUSS)

Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 24 September 2020 13:48 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: i2nsf@ietf.org
Delivered-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 977C53A093D; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 06:48:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model@ietf.org, i2nsf-chairs@ietf.org, i2nsf@ietf.org, Linda Dunbar <dunbar.ll@gmail.com>, dunbar.ll@gmail.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.17.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <160095532014.32438.8171497019550914031@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 06:48:40 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/xisQ-W2M5suRmbJXLHQaNwnK81g>
Subject: [I2nsf] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-12: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: i2nsf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "*I2NSF: Interface to Network Security Functions mailing list*" <i2nsf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2nsf/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 13:48:41 -0000

Magnus Westerlund has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-12: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I support Benjamin's discuss on the lack of semantics. It is impossible to
review the transport related parameters for correctness as they lack the
semantics to understand if they do map to protocol values.

This discuss is more a place holder to be aware that this document needs to
re-reviewed after having addressed by transport people.