Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption
From: "Zarny, Myo" <[email-masked]>
To: "[email-masked]'" <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]'" <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]'" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 10:25:09 -0500
List-Id: "*I2NSF: Interface to Network Security Functions mailing list*" <i2nsf.ietf.org>

+1

-----Original Message-----
From: I2nsf [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of [email-masked]
Sent: 12 January 2016 10:13 AM
To: [email-masked]; [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption

Dear all,

I too support the adoption of both drafts as i2nsf WG documents. I also second the said compacting strategy as well as Dan's comments about the appropriate track for these documents.

Cheers,

Christian.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: I2nsf [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: 11 January 2016 14:45
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption
> 
> Hi Working group,
> 
> We had a working group milestone before Christmas to "Adopt use Cases, 
> problem statement, and gap analysis as WG document".
> 
> Per the discussions in Yokohama, we struggled to compact all of this
information
> into a single document and plan to move ahead with two documents. The 
> first is
a
> combined problem statement and use case document, the second is a gap 
> analysis of existing IETF technologies.
> 
> We checked with the AD and she is happy that we take this approach.
> 
> Sue has been working on this and has posted
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-i2nsf-merged-problem-use-
> cases/
> and
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-i2nsf-gap-analysis/
> 
> These replace
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-i2nsf-use-case-gap-analys
> is/
> 
> There was some small discussion on the list raising some points that 
> may be addressed, but I think we can carry on, so this email starts a 
> two week poll
for
> adoption of these documents as working group drafts. The poll will end 
> on January 25th.
> 
> Please read the documents and express an opinion one way or another, 
> preferably giving a reason for your thoughts.
> 
> Since Linda is a co-author of
> draft-hares-i2nsf-merged-problem-use-cases, I
will
> call consensus on that document.
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> I2nsf mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf

_______________________________________________
I2nsf mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

_______________________________________________
I2nsf mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf