Re: [i2rs] Consensus on draft-i2rs-ephemeral-state-15.txt

Joe Clarke <jclarke@cisco.com> Sun, 28 August 2016 14:30 UTC

Return-Path: <jclarke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13C8012B04C for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 07:30:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.069
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.069 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hSDV9a0zmiLT for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 07:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E537E12B00B for <i2rs@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 07:30:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=488; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1472394612; x=1473604212; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LnZrsOcHJKIcEwkJEo+SF2S/YRLM2TUbc89HkSQR/fY=; b=JhBUn+sOb9MAEjneke241KdURqycpWqAkEtrGgBtCDY7yqbvWK04D4ms kTKKTU8sQYAqTTmkb8mQyV9IVA/W2O5/QSIeIxXo6agAuQjg+qt9HGDCH rtq2FlrdRFLaru5dxOzNs+2NU0Mx4NfI+C2WgBOO5SQhgPlY2dwm2c7uk s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CLAQCK9MJX/4QNJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBgykBAQEBAR6BAY4AqnaCAYYTCgKBLjgUAQIBAQEBAQEBXieEYgEBBDhRCw4?= =?us-ascii?q?KLlcGAQwIAQGIPL0dAQEBAQEBAQECAQEBAQEBIYYugXgIgk2KHAEEmU+PK4FXi?= =?us-ascii?q?ASFepA9HjaEOCCHAAEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,591,1464652800"; d="scan'208";a="140771626"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 28 Aug 2016 14:30:11 +0000
Received: from [10.118.87.88] (rtp-jclarke-nitro7.cisco.com [10.118.87.88]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7SEUAgb004227; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 14:30:10 GMT
To: Russ White <7riw77@gmail.com>, i2rs@ietf.org
References: <012501d2011f$030d8f80$0928ae80$@gmail.com>
From: Joe Clarke <jclarke@cisco.com>
Organization: Cisco Systems, Inc.
Message-ID: <43aeb0c2-cb03-6691-1226-d2e00ee77fc1@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 10:30:09 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <012501d2011f$030d8f80$0928ae80$@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2rs/3trL6uROkoKSc3rHaiKsl6tbLb0>
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Consensus on draft-i2rs-ephemeral-state-15.txt
X-BeenThere: i2rs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <i2rs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2rs/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2rs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 14:30:14 -0000

On 8/28/16 07:26, Russ White wrote:
> Y'all --
>
> The I2RS WG LC on the RIB Informational Model completed on the 15th of
> August. We let it run a little long, but it appears the WG has reached
> consensus on this document. The next steps for this document are Shepherd
> reviews and routing-area reviews prior to submission to the IESG.

Assuming the subject is correct :-) I had some additional feedback on 
ephemeral state on the ML to which I didn't see a response.

Joe