Re: [i2rs] [yang-doctors] draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology

[Susan Hares <[e-mail]>]

Juergen:

This is the answer I expected, but I needed to ask. 

Thank you, Susan Hares 

-----Original Message-----
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 12:03 PM
To: Susan Hares
Cc: 'Reshad Rahman (rrahman)'; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
[e-mail]; 'Benjamin Kaduk'
Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology

On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 11:47:45AM -0400, Susan Hares wrote:
> 
> 1) Is this the normal assumption for yang models?

This is a question for IEEE bridge experts, not yang doctors.
 
> 2) If not, what is the normal assumption on system mac addresses?

This is	a question for IEEE bridge experts, not yang doctors.
 
> 3) Am I correct that switches with more than 1 system MAC will augment
their basic yang model with the second system MAC Address? 
>

It depends on the implementor. If you have more than one address, than you
likely add a *list of addresses instead of a second and then a third and so
fourth.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: [phone]         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   [phone]         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>