Re: [i2rs] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-ephemeral-state-19: (with COMMENT)

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Thu, 27 October 2016 11:44 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9620129D82; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 04:44:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.945
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.945 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MK0LJ9qutF8A; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 04:44:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CBDE129A80; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 04:44:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=50.36.87.48;
From: "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com>
To: "'Suresh Krishnan'" <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>, "'The IESG'" <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <147746538654.18955.10864682823495677451.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <147746538654.18955.10864682823495677451.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 07:42:58 -0400
Message-ID: <312601d23047$444fd6e0$ccef84a0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQH6num+kmwtVgHcFlHwxbeynPQpn6BrT/xg
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2rs/JR3y7snJfzTZ7-04Y6U6i1XaCOU>
Cc: draft-ietf-i2rs-ephemeral-state@ietf.org, i2rs@ietf.org, jclarke@cisco.com, i2rs-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-ephemeral-state-19: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: i2rs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <i2rs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2rs/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2rs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:44:58 -0000

Suresh: 

The NETCONF and NETMOD groups have asked the I2RS to specify the
requirements, and not the specific solutions.    We have done
implementations based on NETCONF/RESTCONF that solve these issues, and
described the mechanisms.  However, the NETCONF and 
NETMOD groups have asked us only to provide requirements.  All the solutions
must be discussed in the NETCONF/NETMOD working groups. 

Sue 

-----Original Message-----
From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Suresh Krishnan
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 3:03 AM
To: The IESG
Cc: jclarke@cisco.com; draft-ietf-i2rs-ephemeral-state@ietf.org;
i2rs-chairs@ietf.org; i2rs@ietf.org
Subject: [i2rs] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on
draft-ietf-i2rs-ephemeral-state-19: (with COMMENT)

Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-i2rs-ephemeral-state-19: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-ephemeral-state/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I am surprised to see MUST level requirements on YANG 

"Ephemeral-REQ-06: YANG MUST have the ability to do the following:"

and further requirements on NETCONF (REQ-09) and RESTCONF (REQ-10) in this
document.

Are there associated drafts in the respective WGs to make sure these
requirements are met?


_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
i2rs@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs