Re: [i2rs] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-ephemeral-state-19: (with COMMENT)

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Tue, 25 October 2016 20:38 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 840DF129B42; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:38:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.333
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.333 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WYwKAPo7BA0R; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:38:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771C112966C; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:38:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8A90A1E337; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:40:34 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:40:34 -0400
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <20161025204034.GD23262@pfrc.org>
References: <147742517429.1472.11822233551240489297.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <147742517429.1472.11822233551240489297.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2rs/L7HXcBsXKWbu5txnCtjyuiZHaXs>
Cc: draft-ietf-i2rs-ephemeral-state@ietf.org, i2rs@ietf.org, jclarke@cisco.com, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, i2rs-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-ephemeral-state-19: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: i2rs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <i2rs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2rs/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2rs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 20:38:15 -0000

Ben,

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:52:54PM -0700, Ben Campbell wrote:
> I'm curious about the requirements on YANG and NETCONF/RESTCONF. Does
> this contemplate changes to those? Criteria to determine if they are
> acceptable choices?

Over the last several years, i2rs offered several examples of what such a
change would look like.  The netmod/netconf groups have made it rather clear
that they wish to be the ones that provide the standardization for that
work.

This document states requirements.  Work in those groups that satisfy the
requirements will be sufficient.

-- Jeff (who has a feeling it'll resemble stuff we've talked about
anyway...)