[i2rs] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-ephemeral-state-19: (with COMMENT)

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Tue, 25 October 2016 19:52 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <147742517429.1472.11822233551240489297.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 12:52:54 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2rs/NsWXYD7xkaAEhqy8bPp-pK1_EwY>
Cc: jclarke@cisco.com, draft-ietf-i2rs-ephemeral-state@ietf.org, i2rs-chairs@ietf.org, i2rs@ietf.org
Subject: [i2rs] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-ephemeral-state-19: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-i2rs-ephemeral-state-19: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-ephemeral-state/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm curious about the requirements on YANG and NETCONF/RESTCONF. Does
this contemplate changes to those? Criteria to determine if they are
acceptable choices?

[i2rs] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Ben Campbell
Re: [i2rs] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-i… Jeffrey Haas