IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [i2rs] WG LC on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-05.txt extended and draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-network-topo-06.txt (

"Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com> Fri, 30 September 2016 09:53 UTC

Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF95512B05C for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 02:53:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.536
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.536 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.316, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xS69ESkjzR9o for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 02:53:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D31312B012 for <i2rs@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 02:53:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CXE36803; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 09:53:35 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.74) by lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 10:53:34 +0100
Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 17:53:27 +0800
From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "i2rs@ietf.org" <i2rs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [i2rs] WG LC on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-05.txt extended and draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-network-topo-06.txt (
Thread-Index: AdITSCbrtSHgUQMgRaWQOQMKPW0cEAHt0HDg
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 09:53:27 +0000
Message-ID: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C927934F8391@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <20c001d21348$831721b0$89456510$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <20c001d21348$831721b0$89456510$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.130.151.75]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C927934F8391NKGEML515MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020203.57EE3620.0060, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: d0ad1d49da7451a3d7fbdbe83fa00795
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2rs/ORhxt5mI7dGQDDSOZpmAYSR6E8c>
Cc: 'Benoit Claise' <bclaise@cisco.com>, 'Russ White' <russ@riw.us>, 'Alia Atlas' <akatlas@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [i2rs] WG LC on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-05.txt extended and draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-network-topo-06.txt (
X-BeenThere: i2rs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <i2rs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2rs/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2rs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 09:53:42 -0000

Support both drafts.

The base network topology model is fundamental for other topology models, and the L3 topology model is an important augmentation to the base model. Both drafts are in good shape.

Best regards,
Jie

From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 10:09 PM
To: i2rs@ietf.org
Cc: 'Benoit Claise' <bclaise@cisco.com>; 'Russ White' <russ@riw.us>; 'Alia Atlas' <akatlas@gmail.com>
Subject: [i2rs] WG LC on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-05.txt extended and draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-network-topo-06.txt (

This begins a 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-04.txt (9/20 to 10/4) and draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-network-topo-06.txt from 9/20 to 10/3.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo/

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology/<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology/>
In considering this draft, the I2RS WG should consider:

1)      Does the implementations of this draft in ODL open source code base sufficient experience on the Yang drafts?

2)      Does anyone know of other implementations of this model?

3)       Do you believe this Yang model is stable enough to publish and distribute to yang libraries?
 We did a WG LC in August, but we suspect this got caught in the August vacation email.
Sue Hares and Russ White
Co-chairs

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email