IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [i2rs] Comments on Ephemeral-REQ-07 (local config vs. ephemeral)

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Wed, 20 July 2016 15:14 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC1612D94B for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:14:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.738
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.738 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, RDNS_NONE=0.793] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6ZfolwuQsii5 for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (unknown [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16AF912D7DA for <i2rs@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:14:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=31.133.160.179;
From: "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com>
To: "'Joel M. Halpern'" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, "'Joe Clarke'" <jclarke@cisco.com>, "'Russ White'" <7riw77@gmail.com>, <i2rs@ietf.org>
References: <3b4hc19ywdtjui9gp6yu90i7.1469014886778@email.android.com> <20160720115932.GA52435@elstar.local> <599d04d1-fdf7-6777-3f61-55cfcba57f89@cisco.com> <90f526cd-8de8-60c5-180a-84717558ca5a@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <90f526cd-8de8-60c5-180a-84717558ca5a@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 11:13:47 -0400
Message-ID: <010801d1e299$5a9605b0$0fc21110$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQJKVNFXiymuhMiOydHAhBjghdVAFQIGCToKAaXK/poA9hBtsZ8LebeQ
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2rs/PVsdpdOZ7G4KMaS3cFea3GiJd9k>
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Comments on Ephemeral-REQ-07 (local config vs. ephemeral)
X-BeenThere: i2rs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <i2rs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2rs/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2rs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:14:55 -0000

Works for me!

Sue 

-----Original Message-----
From: Joel M. Halpern [mailto:jmh@joelhalpern.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 8:56 AM
To: Joe Clarke; Susan Hares; 'Russ White'; i2rs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Comments on Ephemeral-REQ-07 (local config vs.
ephemeral)

That text works for me.
Thanks,
Joel

On 7/20/16 8:52 AM, Joe Clarke wrote:
> On 7/20/16 07:59, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
>> The text I comment to says "individual ephemeral configuration 
>> changes" - I was not able to infer from this that it was supposed to 
>> imply "individual I2RS clients".
>
> I agree with both you and Joel.  "Individual" should apply to clients, 
> but we need to have something that ties priority to local config.
>
> What about:
>
> Req-07: Local configuration MUST have a priority that is comparable 
> with individual I2RS client priorities for making changes.  This 
> priority will determine whether local configuration changes or 
> individual ephemeral configuration changes take precedence as described in
RFC7921.
>  The I2RS protocol MUST support his mechanism.
>
> Joe
>

v2.10.0 | Report a Bug | By Email