Re: [i2rs] 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-i2rs-traceabilty

"Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com> Tue, 26 May 2015 22:05 UTC

Return-Path: <gsalguei@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB471B3229; Tue, 26 May 2015 15:05:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8IW3oqEChGku; Tue, 26 May 2015 15:05:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C02B1B320B; Tue, 26 May 2015 15:05:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=13437; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1432677915; x=1433887515; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=uGILI0wyIZ2UuPF06D5dvIJ03Fl1FmA1CcxYi3Je92U=; b=Y2LoXbSChyARssvmjbf3wafv0OIqR2HrK9Yoa7grX1cmK9fdIbeRhSwn m8quW8dG20BqZq0ytCALyt6CRPZaEuMlK54ZOeISkrKpdJuWEYzHV6r+W EUq+RC3OfX2UPwTGxVOkhkh3337DNViybGE/vXDFvGK7uO7OZMlvLE4ti k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BFBgDM7GRV/4UNJK1TCYJFS1RetHyNUTyCDoV1AoFLTAEBAQEBAYELhCMBAQQdEEwQAgEIDgQTGgcyFAMOAQEEDgWILA3MaAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAReLOoQpWAQHgxeBFgWTCIQ1hlqBKT6DM5IVI4N4b4JHAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,501,1427760000"; d="scan'208,217";a="419690459"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 May 2015 22:05:14 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x12.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x12.cisco.com [173.36.12.86]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t4QM5DoM015685 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 26 May 2015 22:05:13 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.169]) by xhc-aln-x12.cisco.com ([173.36.12.86]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 26 May 2015 17:05:12 -0500
From: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Thread-Topic: 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-i2rs-traceabilty
Thread-Index: AdCX/brn0dvPMo3GSuqLIt07oHEavgAAk6Os
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 22:05:12 +0000
Message-ID: <9CD84E4E-0899-402C-A102-4B6DAFE3CBAF@cisco.com>
References: <012701d097fe$8c8554e0$a58ffea0$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <012701d097fe$8c8554e0$a58ffea0$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9CD84E4E0899402CA1024B6DAFE3CBAFciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2rs/PxZxJ-0adUEBcIbGRCU_L-D6SNo>
Cc: "i2rs@ietf.org" <i2rs@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>, "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com>, Alia Atlas <akatlas@juniper.net>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>, Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Subject: Re: [i2rs] 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-i2rs-traceabilty
X-BeenThere: i2rs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <i2rs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i2rs/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2rs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 22:05:17 -0000

I have no IPR to declare related to this draft, nor do I know of any.

Regards,

Gonzalo



On May 26, 2015, at 5:54 PM, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com<mailto:shares@ndzh.com>> wrote:

This begins a 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-i2rs-traceability-02<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-traceability/> from (5/26 to 6/9)
(http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-traceability/)


I2RS Status: WG LC (5/26 to 6/9)

Carlos, joe, and Gonzalo – please indicate whether you know of any IPR on this draft.


This document is a companion to three other documents for I2RS requirements which have WG calls:


1)      This begins a 2 week adoption call for draft-haas-i2rs-ephemeral-state-req:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-haas-i2rs-ephemeral-state-reqs/



  This document covers requests to the netmod and netconf Working

   Groups for functionality to support the ephemeral state requirements

   to implement the I2RS architecture.



Status: WG adoption call (5/26 to 6/9)



2)      draft-haas-i2rs-netmod-netconf-requirements-01<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-haas-i2rs-netmod-netconf-requirements/>

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-haas-i2rs-netmod-netconf-requirements/



[This draft is an early set of requirements from which the ephemeral state and “identity, secondary-identity and priority” were pulled into draft-haas-i2rs-ephemeral-state-reqs.  The  notification-subscription were pulled into the draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirments.   The traceability had been separated before draft-haas-i2rs-nemod-netconf-requirements was published. This draft remains the only source for mutual authentication requirements (section 2.2), transaction requirements, and the history of the discussion.   This draft is being requested to be adopted as a general roadmap for the I2RS WG. In the future, the I2RS WG will accept more detailed specification on the mutual authentication or the transaction protocol.



I2RS Status: WG Adoption (5/26 to 6/9)


3)      draf-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-02.



http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements/



I2RS Status: WG LC (5/26 to 6/9)



This thread is to discuss WG consensus on  draft-ietf-i2rs-traceability-02<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-traceability/> .  Please discuss the merits of the traceability framework described in this draft as being part of the requirements forwarded to netmod/netconf.   Also discuss if this framework provides the necessary things for I2RS deployment.

This draft will also be forwarded as part of the requirements to the IESG.

Sue Hares