IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [i2rs] Can I2RS focus on the "Over the Wire" data structure , not on how end point handle the "DataStore"?

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Wed, 01 June 2016 12:30 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C6412D1A1 for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 05:30:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.328
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.328 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UsVSQ6JsTYxK for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 05:30:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D95812D194 for <i2rs@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 05:30:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 89C8A1E335; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 08:35:50 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 08:35:50 -0400
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, "i2rs@ietf.org" <i2rs@ietf.org>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20160601123550.GP10531@pfrc.org>
References: <20160531063840.GA21289@elstar.local> <00d501d1bb45$0da83500$28f89f00$@ndzh.com> <20160531142540.GA22420@elstar.local> <001401d1bb4e$cfaefd10$6f0cf730$@ndzh.com> <20160531171304.GA22857@elstar.local> <CABCOCHR2JChAg1zmKDy_qxVOGYVeTm9wGVLyxzpChb5Ht0uaww@mail.gmail.com> <20160531195123.GN17462@pfrc.org> <CABCOCHQka+BezA6pLSiyOPcTghgx-UKK5dY6y70nME_EFZxCZg@mail.gmail.com> <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F657EACE6D@dfweml501-mbb> <20160601083922.GB24118@elstar.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160601083922.GB24118@elstar.local>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2rs/S50CPfI9J5VVdixS8XANu5lmd2c>
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Can I2RS focus on the "Over the Wire" data structure , not on how end point handle the "DataStore"?
X-BeenThere: i2rs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <i2rs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2rs/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2rs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 12:30:22 -0000

On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 10:39:22AM +0200, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> I think a client needs to know what it means to modify a certain
> datastore. A client needs to know what validation means. If people
> code against <running>, <indented>, <applied>, <ephemeral> (and there
> are more suggested) and it is undefined how things conceptually relate
> to each other and interact with each other, then I have my doubts this
> will lead to interoperability since systems likely expose rather
> different behavior.

+1

-- Jeff

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email