Re: [i2rs] Comments on Ephemeral-REQ-07 (local config vs. ephemeral)

Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Wed, 20 July 2016 15:22 UTC

Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA60D12D796 for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J5C4JkyQpMYo for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:21:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x233.google.com (mail-qk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49B8512D838 for <i2rs@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:21:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id o67so48181638qke.1 for <i2rs@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:21:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=lB/H+gBZjEDUOK7iKbQe2XWWabyiwj30fXgVCenwAHw=; b=WxgWfLfYGcDvgSO/MnfBQmqpnlbOdCZzkLscQYL392SaPRfb7CcNdVHeEJkOAUfsol mLcgED1hY4vslGtRkNmaandaIUBIO2qshN8RADolWsqRNfWh6a0/mVl6x0vqozjcOI6q 1NlvxyRp+BFAYhB3b2lOZeme4LWRG5xr5cNdCxbvgDhH2RUTXMeo0Eo5g9C5wPx73cWS 8D2OIMz0m0Ta02MurCOeMQxnYqF+Ih7XVcGQ1rUU253f6EP/JTf9SpLhpgHe4sumeT7l tCs58rFwIateGVkIIQU5DQcPioUmrQpqiPP8EF2igz+MhqYHON8yQQ+ENBSgH620K3MY 9iEg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=lB/H+gBZjEDUOK7iKbQe2XWWabyiwj30fXgVCenwAHw=; b=mF8VQdhDH0/vpzHKcAWFrkj0UENXQb0+bSY9k6Z4nInxr87mm1FPTXtUg36YguFrjO 1SXFdSEloQ9Ie/IsrzG6zjbYDrITErVx64/pd5++UX30STz6+zWQgGtGOgFvPQVg+Wxs U8/UdcfmhgctCWq96cPdU6A89Motsb5FSW5NnpK9U5rYmQo7xF6akuMSqjoU6bMAWLKm OQX8KPg3u0ihghNG1Lm2eksb4eev1sjkvllysuLYEWnVZ/ReCwB30WPjAxIJ7RoLH2ey Oc+riNhKeIdb1jTNsS417znEU6woUnmVL7pkEWYhWa4f3cuWDSCTSCUDKj8CymoG+pUU 9Edw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tI38N3X7qGyUChub5bPArYnMVDwVKJeZJP6WZSOGm7sNaP/xOqq/KI8l9ooR06lQ2EbdRMFWfUy/foFKQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.55.73.148 with SMTP id w142mr63127473qka.77.1469028115394; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:21:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.237.52.193 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:21:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.237.52.193 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:21:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <010801d1e299$5a9605b0$0fc21110$@ndzh.com>
References: <3b4hc19ywdtjui9gp6yu90i7.1469014886778@email.android.com> <20160720115932.GA52435@elstar.local> <599d04d1-fdf7-6777-3f61-55cfcba57f89@cisco.com> <90f526cd-8de8-60c5-180a-84717558ca5a@joelhalpern.com> <010801d1e299$5a9605b0$0fc21110$@ndzh.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 11:21:54 -0400
Message-ID: <CAG4d1rcMWwNyBA=+1JCYJuATOAcB0s-C8VCdG81Xv8Tug3nQpA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
To: Sue Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114a8808fbb540053812c23d
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2rs/UMM8wDt5vz9EiNlFhOXpBzjowQ0>
Cc: i2rs@ietf.org, Joe Clarke <jclarke@cisco.com>, Russ White <7riw77@gmail.com>, "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Comments on Ephemeral-REQ-07 (local config vs. ephemeral)
X-BeenThere: i2rs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <i2rs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2rs/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2rs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:22:01 -0000

LGTM

On Jul 20, 2016 5:15 PM, "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:

> Works for me!
>
> Sue
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joel M. Halpern [mailto:jmh@joelhalpern.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 8:56 AM
> To: Joe Clarke; Susan Hares; 'Russ White'; i2rs@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [i2rs] Comments on Ephemeral-REQ-07 (local config vs.
> ephemeral)
>
> That text works for me.
> Thanks,
> Joel
>
> On 7/20/16 8:52 AM, Joe Clarke wrote:
> > On 7/20/16 07:59, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> >> The text I comment to says "individual ephemeral configuration
> >> changes" - I was not able to infer from this that it was supposed to
> >> imply "individual I2RS clients".
> >
> > I agree with both you and Joel.  "Individual" should apply to clients,
> > but we need to have something that ties priority to local config.
> >
> > What about:
> >
> > Req-07: Local configuration MUST have a priority that is comparable
> > with individual I2RS client priorities for making changes.  This
> > priority will determine whether local configuration changes or
> > individual ephemeral configuration changes take precedence as described
> in
> RFC7921.
> >  The I2RS protocol MUST support his mechanism.
> >
> > Joe
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> i2rs mailing list
> i2rs@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
>