Re: [i2rs] [yang-doctors] draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology

[Susan Hares <[e-mail]>]

Reshad: 

 

Thank you for quick response.   However, I’m confused.   Where do you see the IP address in the Yang snippet I sent?  It is a MAC Address (type yang:mac-address)?  If the system port allows IP, it will respond to the ARP request with the appropriate IP/MAC match in an ARP reply.   

 

In real implementations I2rs implementers examined, 

·         L2 port with mgmt-mac-address seems to be used to only send LLDP packets, 

·         L2 port with sys-mac-address seems to be used for management using TCP/IP.  

 

If we swap the names, it did not work with the initial implementers of the yang model.  The  I2RS Topology models are used for operational management of switches and routers as logical units. 

 

Also, your response does not seem to match my questions: 

 

1) Is this the normal assumption for yang models? 

2) If not, what is the normal assumption on system mac addresses? 

3) Am I correct that switches with more than 1 system MAC will augment their basic yang model with the second system MAC Address? 

 

I’m sorry to bother you but this document is being reviewed by the IESG  tomorrow (Thursday) and 

I am the shepherd.  I do not know how to answer some of the yang related questions regarding multiple system ports to exchange management configuration on.  

 

I had thought that netconf/restconf would be exchanged over the same ports so the yang doctors would know what the normal custom should be. 

 

Thanks again! 

 

Sue  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

From: Reshad Rahman (rrahman) [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 11:27 AM
To: Susan Hares; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]; 'Benjamin Kaduk'
Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology

 

Hi,

 

So sys-mac-address is supposed to be the MAC address of the mgmt port, i.e. the device would respond to an ARP request for management-address with sys-mac-address? I think use of term system might be a bit misleading if that’s the case, mgmt-mac-address might be better.

 

Also, it is odd to have an IP address in an L2 grouping.

 

Disclaimer: not familiar with that draft at all, just took a look at the L2 grouping.

 

Regards,

Reshad.

 

From: yang-doctors <[e-mail]> on behalf of Susan Hares <[e-mail]>
Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 at 11:12 AM
To: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
Cc: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, 'Benjamin Kaduk' <[e-mail]>
Subject: [yang-doctors] draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology

 

The following question was asked by Ben Kaduk during IESG review of the following document: 

 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology/

 

     grouping l2-node-attributes {

         [...]

         leaf sys-mac-address {

           type yang:mac-address;

           description

             "System MAC address.";

         }

 

If there are more than 1 system mac address in a switch, how would this model handle it. 

 

My understanding is that most switches have 1 system mac address for network management.  Therefore, the L2 topology model supports one. 

 

Question for Yang Doctors: 

 

1) Is this the normal assumption for yang models? 

2) If not, what is the normal assumption on system mac addresses? 

 

3) Am I correct that switches with more than 1 system MAC will augment their basic yang model with the second system MAC Address. 

 

Thank you, Susan Hares