Re: [i2rs] Consensus on draft-i2rs-ephemeral-state-15.txt

"Susan Hares" <> Sun, 28 August 2016 14:03 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 080CB12B046 for <>; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 07:03:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.945
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.945 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VNcvmhb-obaE for <>; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 07:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C82F512B039 for <>; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 07:03:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=;
From: Susan Hares <>
To: 'Russ White' <>,
References: <012501d2011f$030d8f80$0928ae80$>
In-Reply-To: <012501d2011f$030d8f80$0928ae80$>
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 10:02:26 -0400
Message-ID: <001801d20134$cfae75d0$6f0b6170$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQFJeZXwpxig9Gy6D9mOEK2QtHfaAaFvcZyw
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <>
Cc: 'Dean Bogdanovic' <>
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Consensus on draft-i2rs-ephemeral-state-15.txt
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 14:03:45 -0000


I believe you meant the ephemeral state has completed its working group last
call.   We did not have a WG LC on the I2RS RIB. 


-----Original Message-----
From: i2rs [] On Behalf Of Russ White
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2016 7:26 AM
Subject: [i2rs] Consensus on draft-i2rs-ephemeral-state-15.txt

Y'all --

The I2RS WG LC on the RIB Informational Model completed on the 15th of
August. We let it run a little long, but it appears the WG has reached
consensus on this document. The next steps for this document are Shepherd
reviews and routing-area reviews prior to submission to the IESG.

Russ & Sue

i2rs mailing list