Re: [i2rs] relationship between "draft-ietf-i2rs-pkt-eca-data-model-00.txt" and "draft-ietf-i2rs-fb-rib-data-model-00"?

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Thu, 30 June 2016 14:12 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E8F012D0DA for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 07:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.139
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.139 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kEC8-6T8tK27 for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 07:12:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (unknown [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3695128E19 for <i2rs@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 07:12:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=174.124.195.80;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: 'Linda Dunbar' <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
References: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F657ED8E6F@dfweml501-mbb>
In-Reply-To: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F657ED8E6F@dfweml501-mbb>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 10:12:20 -0400
Message-ID: <49ba01d1d2d9$6a616900$3f243b00$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_49BB_01D1D2B7.E351EBE0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQHncFAgf84dghdL2BTfsUw/dGlBUJ/WzK2A
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2rs/lJ5mL5a45BVSTh0v7lVXGpqMs1E>
Cc: i2rs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [i2rs] relationship between "draft-ietf-i2rs-pkt-eca-data-model-00.txt" and "draft-ietf-i2rs-fb-rib-data-model-00"?
X-BeenThere: i2rs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <i2rs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2rs/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2rs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 14:12:57 -0000

Linda: 

 

The English text may be similar, but the yang data modules are different in
the drafts.  Since filters are still under consideration, I wanted to handle
draft-ietf-i2rs-pkt-eca-data-model separately from the FB-RIB.  The drafts
can be merged or left separate.  

 

Is there a reason to merge these drafts?

 

Sue 

 

 

From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Linda Dunbar
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 7:21 PM
To: Susan Hares
Cc: i2rs@ietf.org
Subject: [i2rs] relationship between
"draft-ietf-i2rs-pkt-eca-data-model-00.txt" and
"draft-ietf-i2rs-fb-rib-data-model-00"?

 

Sue, qin and Russ, 

 

It seems to me that there are a lot of overlap between the following two
drafts:

 

-          draft-ietf-i2rs-pkt-eca-data-model-00.txt

-          draft-ietf-i2rs-fb-rib-data-model-00

 

they are all on forwarding packets based on matching criteria of various
packet headers (L2/L3/L4). 

 

Why need two separate IDs? 

Can we merge them? 

 

Just curious. 

 

Linda