Re: Keeping in step with URCs

Renato Iannella <renato@dstc.edu.au> Mon, 29 January 1996 04:02 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24910; 28 Jan 96 23:02 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24891; 28 Jan 96 23:02 EST
Received: from services.Bunyip.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14237; 28 Jan 96 23:01 EST
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by services.bunyip.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) id WAA20329 for iafa-out; Sun, 28 Jan 1996 22:59:20 -0500
Received: from mocha.bunyip.com (mocha.Bunyip.Com [192.197.208.1]) by services.bunyip.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with SMTP id WAA20324; Sun, 28 Jan 1996 22:59:17 -0500
Received: from trapdoor.dstc.edu.au by mocha.bunyip.com with SMTP (5.65a/IDA-1.4.2b/CC-Guru-2b) id AA23089 (mail destined for whoispp-schema@services.bunyip.com); Sun, 28 Jan 96 22:59:07 -0500
Received: from nova.dstc.edu.au (nova.dstc.edu.au [130.102.176.9]) by trapdoor.dstc.edu.au (8.6.9/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA13473; Mon, 29 Jan 1996 13:58:52 +1000
Received: (from renato@localhost) by nova.dstc.edu.au (8.6.12/8.6.10) id NAA00496; Mon, 29 Jan 1996 13:58:05 +1000
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Renato Iannella <renato@dstc.edu.au>
Message-Id: <199601290358.NAA00496@nova.dstc.edu.au>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 1996 13:58:05 +1000 (EST)
Subject: Re: Keeping in step with URCs
To: J.P.Knight@lut.ac.uk
Cc: urc@spam.gatech.edu, iafa@bunyip.com, whoispp-schema@bunyip.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960124191046.7803Y-100000@weeble.lut.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Ishmail 1.1-950804-sol24
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Orig-Sender: owner-iafa@bunyip.com
Precedence: bulk

Jon Knight <J.P.Knight@lut.ac.uk>; wrote:
> 
> It would be great to compare notes with other groups that look after 
> large collections of Internet resource descriptions, in whatever format 
> they're currently using.  Ideally this would give us an idea as to 
> whether its feasible to devise a minimal "lowest common denominator" URC 
> format.  We'd like to have some hard figures before we suggest anything 
> formally to the group.  It would also be interesting to compare these 
> results to the Dublin Core elements.

Jon, we have implemented a URC service based on
the Dublin Core Metadata set.
With some small modifications, we found Dublin Core
to be a good base to describe document-like objects.
We currently tested it with about 50 technical reports.

The URN Interoperability Project at:
  http://www.dstc.edu.au/RDU/TURNIP/
shows our work. We have been cooperating with the
Centre for Earth Observation and their URC service
(which uses IAFA)

We also developed an internal library system (to catalogue
our books and journals) and used Dublin Core.



Cheers... Renato
_______________________________________________________________________
Dr Renato Iannella                  http://www.dstc.edu.au/RDU/staff/ri
Research Data Network CRC                 phone/fax: +61 7 3365 4310/11
DSTC Pty Ltd, Gehrmann Laboratories         urn:dstc.edu.au:renato:home
University of Queensland, 4072, AUSTRALIA     email: renato@dstc.edu.au