Re: Yet another version of the draft
Martijn Koster <m.koster@nexor.co.uk> Wed, 19 October 1994 11:13 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01215; 19 Oct 94 7:13 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01211; 19 Oct 94 7:13 EDT
Received: from mocha.Bunyip.Com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03722; 19 Oct 94 7:13 EDT
Received: by mocha.bunyip.com (5.65a/IDA-1.4.2b/CC-Guru-2b) id AA09268 on Wed, 19 Oct 94 05:18:59 -0400
Received: from sifon.CC.McGill.CA by mocha.bunyip.com with SMTP (5.65a/IDA-1.4.2b/CC-Guru-2b) id AA09264 (mail destined for /usr/lib/sendmail -odq -oi -fiafa-request iafa-out) on Wed, 19 Oct 94 05:18:57 -0400
Received: from lancaster.nexor.co.uk (lancaster.nexor.co.uk [128.243.6.3]) by sifon.CC.McGill.CA (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id FAA07993 for <iafa@cc.mcgill.ca>; Wed, 19 Oct 1994 05:18:06 -0400
Message-Id: <199410190918.FAA07993@sifon.CC.McGill.CA>
Received: from nexor.co.uk (actually host victor.nexor.co.uk) by lancaster.nexor.co.uk with SMTP (PP); Wed, 19 Oct 1994 10:15:13 +0100
To: Jill.Foster@newcastle.ac.uk
Cc: iafa@cc.mcgill.ca
Subject: Re: Yet another version of the draft
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 19 Oct 1994 09:29:33 BST." <199410190829.JAA05112@tuda.ncl.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 1994 10:15:01 +0100
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Martijn Koster <m.koster@nexor.co.uk>
> 1. [...] > 2. [...] > 4. [...] Fixed. > 3. You changed the wording below to acommodate the word "Details" > which I think should have been "Date" in the first place. ie - Date record > was last maintained. Hmm, I wanted to indicate it's not just the date, but also contact details. How about "Details describing when the record was last maintained, and by whom" ? > Hope this helps :-) Yup, Thanks; all comments more than welcome. [no sooner had I said this and even more comments arrived :-) ] > I've just discovered that I'd somehow been dropped off the iafa mailing > list around the start of the year Bummer. I wondered where all the original crowd had gone. > and that there had been some revisions of the internet draft since > then. (Only some of which had been announced - and therefore I'd > seen.) We wanted to at least agree on the list before fixing a new revision. > Having said that - registration of template types poses other problems. I agree that registration is an issue, and probably required. But as it is a hairy subject I wonder if we can address it in a separate document? > o I agree that there needs to be a way to insert comments. This is > for several reasons: OK > o A few of the typos: All fixed. > o 3.3 item 7) Blank is defined as octal 40 - fine (that's the way I > think of it) but the URI docs etc tend to talk in hex OK, changed to hex. > o 3.3 item 10) I still think "latitude and longitude" is a bit > pretentious. Can you elaborate? > o 3.6.2 Not sure why we need organisation-postal *and* > organisation-city, -state, -country. Hmmm. The -{city,state,country} are nice as search constraints for resources, we do need those. At the same time you may want to display "Contact $postal" and be done with it. We can either leave it, or suggest Postal shouldn't include city, state, or country. Any thoughts? > o Examples: > > Sally suggested that names be "Lastname, first names". If this is > agreed - the examples would need changing. Has anyone else got any strong desires/arguments either way? I personally always think it looks silly, and am not convinced sorting is always important. > That's it for now. Nice work Martijn, Alan and Markus. Thanks for the comments, keep them comming. -- Martijn __________ Internet: m.koster@nexor.co.uk X-400: C=GB; A= ; P=Nexor; O=Nexor; S=koster; I=M X-500: c=GB@o=NEXOR Ltd@cn=Martijn Koster WWW: http://web.nexor.co.uk/mak/mak.html
- Yet another version of the draft Martijn Koster
- Re: Yet another version of the draft Jill.Foster
- Re: Yet another version of the draft Martijn Koster
- Re: Yet another version of the draft Jill Foster