Re: IAFA documents

Aydin Edguer <> Tue, 17 August 1993 22:26 UTC

Received: from by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16743; 17 Aug 93 18:26 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16739; 17 Aug 93 18:26 EDT
Received: from by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26439; 17 Aug 93 18:26 EDT
Received: by (5.65a/IDA-1.4.2b/CC-Guru-2b) id AA04090 on Tue, 17 Aug 93 17:01:17 -0400
Received: from alpha.CES.CWRU.Edu by with SMTP (5.65a/IDA-1.4.2b/CC-Guru-2b) id AA04086 (mail destined for /usr/lib/sendmail -odq -oi -fiafa-request iafa-out) on Tue, 17 Aug 93 17:01:11 -0400
Received: from sentinel.CES.CWRU.Edu by alpha.CES.CWRU.Edu with SMTP (5.64+/ane. id AA02785; Tue, 17 Aug 93 17:01:04 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Aydin Edguer <>
Message-Id: <9308172101.AA02785@alpha.CES.CWRU.Edu>
Subject: Re: IAFA documents
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 93 17:00:47 EDT
In-Reply-To: <>; from "Alan Emtage" at Aug 16, 93 11:58 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]

>       (1) Files that may contain multiple instances of a given category
>           (a set of mailing lists, for example) will be divided into
>           records and each record containing multiple fields.
>       (2) No indexing file under this scheme may contain more than one
> 	  record (as defined above).

Excuse me, but could someone explain the reasoning behind this limitation?
I can understand why one might would want to limit a file to a single
Template-Type, I fail to see why it should be limited to one record.

The alternate method for naming indexing files may prove popular on ISO
CD-ROMs containing archives.  The limitation of one record per file seems

Thank you,
Aydin Edguer