Update on the Gopher subject list proposal
Ton Verschuren <Ton.Verschuren@surfnet.nl> Tue, 01 December 1992 12:28 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01337; 1 Dec 92 7:28 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01333; 1 Dec 92 7:28 EST
Received: from kona.CC.McGill.CA by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03818; 1 Dec 92 7:28 EST
Received: by kona.cc.mcgill.ca (5.65a/IDA-1.4.2b/CC-Guru-2b) id AA06310 on Tue, 1 Dec 92 03:58:49 -0500
Received: from survis.surfnet.nl by kona.cc.mcgill.ca with SMTP (5.65a/IDA-1.4.2b/CC-Guru-2b) id AA06305 (mail destined for /usr/lib/sendmail -odq -oi -fnir-request nir-out) on Tue, 1 Dec 92 03:58:37 -0500
Received: from surfnet.nl by survis.surfnet.nl with SMTP (PP) id <09660-0@survis.surfnet.nl>; Tue, 1 Dec 1992 09:58:16 +0100
Received: from localhost by surprice.surfnet.nl (4.1/SMI-4.1(TV920629)) id AA25192; Tue, 1 Dec 92 09:58:13 +0100
Message-Id: <9212010858.AA25192@surprice.surfnet.nl>
To: Jill.Foster@newcastle.ac.uk
Cc: Anders Gillner <awg@sunet.se>, eurogopher@ebone.net, gvl@unt.edu, iafa@cc.mcgill.ca, jkrey@isi.edu, nir@cc.mcgill.ca
Subject: Update on the Gopher subject list proposal
In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 01 Dec 92 05:21:01 +0000. <emu-ct08.1992.1201.052101.njf@eata.ncl.ac.uk>
Organisation: SURFnet bv
Address: Cluetinckborch, P.O. Box 19035, 3501 DA Utrecht, NL
Phone: +31 30 310290
Telefax: +31 30 340903
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 1992 09:58:04 +0100
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Ton Verschuren <Ton.Verschuren@surfnet.nl>
Hi all, This discussion is spreading out over more and more lists. It started on eurogopher, then iafa was added and now I add nir as requested by Jill Foster. That means I'll be getting every message 4 times... Maybe we should restrict the discussion to one list after this message? OK, now: Previously on these lists: On eurogopher we have been discussing how to make a subject oriented tree in Gopher instead of the current geographical tree. Then the questiuon pops up: which subject tree, i.e. what classification scheme should we use? In the SURFnet Infoserver project the librarians we cooperate with came up with a classification scheme based on the Unesco Bibliography list. This one contains 33 categories: Unesco Subject List: 1 General 2 Philosophy, psychology 3 Religion, theology 4 Sociology, statistics 5 Political science and economy 6 Law, government administration 7 Military science 8 Instruction and education 9 Trade 10 Ethnology and folklore 11 Linguistics 12 Pure science and history of science 13 Mathematics 14 Astronomy and physics 15 Chemistry 16 Geology, meteorology 17 Biology 18 Medical science 19 Technology, industry, crafts 20 Agriculture, fishery 21 Domestic science 22 Science of industrial organization 23 Urbanization, architecture, arts, photography, film, radio, tv 24 Recreation, sports, games 25 History of literature and criticism 26 Poetry 27 Theatre 28 Prose 29 Various, essays 30 Geography, travel description 31 History, (auto)biography 32 Children's books, cartoons 33 Educational appliances It seems quite a job to map the current subjects into these categories. What we would like to see is that Subject maintainer volunteer to maintain their part of the subject tree. But before that we should reach consensus on a wide scale as to what the best classification scheme is. Tony Barry (tony@info.anu.edu.au) favours the Library of Congress scheme, which can be seen at: Name=The Electronic Library Type=1 Port=70 Path=1/library/elibrary Host=info.anu.edu.au This whole discussion can be read at: Name=Eurogopher mailinglist Type=1 Port=70 Path=m/eurogopher Host=sunic.sunet.se So far for this update. Now let's discuss classification schemes. I would strongly recommend that you involve your local (or national) librarian in this discussion. Bye, Ton Verschuren - Network Development - SURFnet bv ==> From: Jill.Foster@newcastle.ac.uk > Re: > > > > > Ton, > > > > I am including the proposed subject tree as I send this letter as a copy > > to a couple of people and lists. > > Anders and Ton: I'd be grateful if you could send a brief update on this toth e > nir list. > > People here in Australia are interested in working in this area too. > > There are lots of librarians wh would lve to get into the discussion. > (Or I'd love them to!!s > > > > > I've been pointing them to the nir list (as being the list to keep informed o f > new initiatives. ) > > > > discussion. (At least I'd love them to!) > > Excuse typos. > > Keep up the good work. > > -- Jill
- Re: proposal for subjects in subject tree Anders Gillner
- Re: proposal for subjects in subject tree Tim Berners-Lee
- Re: proposal for subjects in subject tree Tony Barry
- Re: proposal for subjects in subject tree Tony Barry
- Re: proposal for subjects in subject tree Reinhard Doelz
- Re: proposal for subjects in subject tree Peter Deutsch
- Re: proposal for subjects in subject tree Anders Gillner
- Re: proposal for subjects in subject tree Billy Barron, VAX/Unix Systems Manager
- Re: proposal for subjects in subject tree Billy Barron, VAX/Unix Systems Manager
- Re: proposal for subjects in subject tree Billy Barron, VAX/Unix Systems Manager
- Re: proposal for subjects in subject tree Tony Barry
- Re: proposal for subjects in subject tree Tony Barry
- Re: proposal for subjects in subject tree Jill.Foster
- Update on the Gopher subject list proposal Ton Verschuren
- Re: proposal for subjects in subject tree Alan Emtage
- Re: proposal for subjects in subject tree Anders Gillner
- Re: proposal for subjects in subject tree Alan Emtage