about use of AFA format
Rafal Maszkowski <rzm@oso.chalmers.se> Fri, 26 August 1994 21:39 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06510; 26 Aug 94 17:39 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06506; 26 Aug 94 17:39 EDT
Received: from mocha.Bunyip.Com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16996; 26 Aug 94 17:40 EDT
Received: by mocha.bunyip.com (5.65a/IDA-1.4.2b/CC-Guru-2b) id AA04752 on Fri, 26 Aug 94 17:11:22 -0400
Received: from oden.oso.chalmers.se by mocha.bunyip.com with SMTP (5.65a/IDA-1.4.2b/CC-Guru-2b) id AA04748 (mail destined for /usr/lib/sendmail -odq -oi -fiafa-request iafa-out) on Fri, 26 Aug 94 17:11:14 -0400
Received: by oden.oso.chalmers.se (5.64/0.0) id AA28078; Fri, 26 Aug 94 23:11:04 +0200
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Rafal Maszkowski <rzm@oso.chalmers.se>
Message-Id: <9408262111.AA28078@oden.oso.chalmers.se>
Subject: about use of AFA format
To: iafa@bunyip.com
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 1994 23:08:54 +0200
X-Acknowledge-To: <rzm@oso.chalmers.se>
Latin-Date: Vineri XXVI August A.D. MCMXCIV
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 2620
X-Orig-Sender: rzm@oso.chalmers.se
2.1 spelling: unqiue 3.6.3 MISCELLANEOUS The following is a list of generic data element subcomponents used when referring to particular resources. These can be added to any of the templates described below. Can they be added many times? I guess not.. It would be convenient to have multiple Description-v* and URI-v* (and others) in SERVICE template. I'm maintaining a list of network resources in Poland (gopher://gopher.mat.uni.torun.pl/00/sieci-w-pl/Polskie_Zasoby_Sieciowe http://www.ict.pwr.wroc.pl/pzs/pzs.html) in my own format and for me it seems to be more natural to have possibility to specify various access types to e.g. to X.500 gate through telnet, gopher and WWW in one template. They (access methods) are equivalent in the same way as document.txt and document.ps are. The same with mailing lists - the running list itself and its archive isn't exatly the same but I would prefer to have information about subscribing and ftp achives URIs, listserv archive URI and comment, gopher archives URIs and News group URI in one template. Mailing list and Usenet group where is it gatewayed to are obviously equivalent. Another use of multiple URI-v*s etc. would be in LARCHIVE. It is always possible to create a separate template for every possible URI/package/area available in the archive and this is closer to the idea of the format but example of LARCHIVE shows that Keywords fiels has several topics included. Why not to have also URIs for all or some of them in the same template? 3.8.2 ORGANIZATION INFORMATION ... Notes on this file. <1> The Internet protocol used to communicate with this service. I don't see any previous <1> in this section. 3.8.4 DOCUMENTS, DATASETS, MAILING LIST ARCHIVES, USENET ARCHIVES, SOFTWARE PACKAGES, IMAGES AND OTHER OBJECTS ... Example 2 ... URI-v0: gopher://power.org/1/pub/Vfifth.tar.Z I think it should be: URI-v0: gopher://power.org/00/pub/Vfifth.tar.Z Bibliography IMHO it would be better to add UR[IL]s to all entries. My General Remarks The order of the fields is not specified (if I'm not wrong). It is good because I'd like to have always Title field as the first one to make waisindex -t para returning these lines in my gopher.. (like gopher://gopher.mat.uni.torun.pl/77/sieci-w-pl/.lists/index does) R. PS. Excuse me if something of the above have been discussed before. -- Rafal Maszkowski rzm@oso.chalmers.se http://www.mat.uni.torun.pl/~rzm Opinia publiczna powinna byc zaalarmowana swoim nieistnieniem - St. J. Lec
- about use of AFA format Rafal Maszkowski
- Re: about use of AFA format Markus Stumpf